Decolonising my music library by renaming “Classical” to “European Classical”. HA take that you posh scumbags
It’s actually hilarious how much class shaming goes into picking a music genre. Half my Irish traditional collection wants to be “Classical”. One of em even preferred “New Age”… Gawd
@meljoann there's an argument that traditional Irish is the classical tradition of Ireland. The Brits wouldn't have it, which is a good enough reason in my book.
@Hakarl i mean all music is classical if you think about it hard enough lol
“Classical” has just become an aspirational genre title over the last century or two… it’s meaningless really.
As a legacy it means “posh blokes paid you to write it and play it”. I think what many people THINK it means is “extremely complex and sophisticated music for geniuses”
@meljoann myeahh I mean for me - 'classical' is a specific era, roughly Mozart-Beethoven. But it's also a term for an art music tradition of courts in Europe, up to something like the late Victorian era.
What I mean really is that sophisticated music with a demanding virtuosity describes a lot of Irish fiddling traditions and neo-classical through avant-garde. I'd put Tommy Potts and Seamus Ennis next to any conservatoire player.
There's a lot in the world of conservatory music that I'd stick by - but I'd definitely say that a lot of 'modern classical' and minimalism are genuinely dogshit. The prestige that follows it is often bullshit, and the culture is increasingly prohibitive of innovation. In the UK at least - east and southern Europe support innovative composers, as do bits of the Germanosphere.
Anyway my point really is the Jagoda Szmytka is great.
@meljoann or, even, Western European Classical