@z428
> how a single user Mastodon instance behaves, compared to ... very mixed experiences trying the same with Friendica
Intriguing! Are you documenting your testing experiences anywhere?
Discussion
@z428
> how a single user Mastodon instance behaves, compared to ... very mixed experiences trying the same with Friendica
Intriguing! Are you documenting your testing experiences anywhere?
@strypey Not in a really structured way. A lot of my insights throughput the last couple of years made it in here though: https://pad.z428.eu/doku.php?id=fediverse-notes-servers
"Gargron as lead developer and inventor of Mastodon has dropped out of the project, apparently by receiving a solid revenue for that, which is not a bad thing in itself but feels a bit shady in some ways."
https://pad.z428.eu/doku.php?id=fediverse-notes-servers
I'm not sure that's fair. AFAIK the ongoing salary is for continuing dev work behind the scenes, while others lead the org. As for shady, if he'd taken Venture Capital he could have made many times the salary he's received as BDFL of a donation-funded project.
@strypey Getting back on that, yes, I'm aware it's not fully fair. And I'm a bit torn about it as Gargron has done quite a job on Mastodon - but then again, I also see a bunch of people in my environment who, even though totally short on money, decided to chip in a few $ to support Mastodon because they believe in the cause. From that perspective, providing the founder with a seven digit revenue has a difficult taste to it.
@z428
> I also see a bunch of people ... who, even though totally short on money, decided to chip in a few $ to support Mastodon
I'm also short on money. So I didn't give any to Mastodon Inc. But if I had, I would expect them to spend it as they see fit.
> From that perspective, providing the founder with a seven digit revenue has a difficult taste to it
AFAIK the salary is not for being a "founder", but for ongoing technical work. Like the salary Torvalds gets as the maintainer of Linux.
@strypey I'm traveling at the moment so more on that later. For now, thanks a bunch for your thoughts.🙂
"Development has been rather fast initially but at some point seems to have slowed down. Some longstanding bugs haven't been addressed in more than five years."
https://pad.z428.eu/doku.php?id=fediverse-notes-servers
Arguably Dansup has overstretched himself (PixelFex, FediDB, Sup Messenger, Loops, etc), rather like Gargron was doing before the recent restructure. As a result, what gets work depends on what's itching at any given time.
(1/2)
@strypey To be sure, I'm not at all angry about @dansup or trying to blame him for things. There have been odd personal things in the past that I don't really understand but that's my thing I guess. My main "public gripe" here is him - specifically talking pixelfed - indeed having massively overstretched himself in here but ... being unable to agree on that. There has been too much communication all along the lines of "pixelfed is ready now I can focus on other projects" even /knowing/ pixelfed is far from ready in many aspects. From that perspective, and from the angle of rather low-level issues still unaddressed in pixelfed, I for sure wouldn't trust something like Sup for maybe more sensitive messaging. All of these things could be perfect if they were backed by some sort of entity, foundation, ... that is able to "scale" better in terms of personal and funding resources to get these things to a really ready, working state.
@evan @benpate