Codeberg is banning "cryptocurrency projects":
https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1254#issuecomment-19820413
I don't know if Mitra qualifies as such, but I guess it is time to move to a self-hosted forge.
18
Replies
·
0
Boosts
@silverpill oh.
Anyway, hosting forgejo doesn't require too much effort.
I've migrated to my own instance recently (with OIDC SSO via Dex, lol) and now moving my projects from github and other places. The only problem for Mitra might be the pull requests: you'll either need to allow registration on your instance or you'll have to migrate to Linux approach with git send-email and git am.
So now waiting for federation to stabilize and we'll build our own git network with cross-instance PRs and comments.
@silverpill I saw that their rules prohibit cryptocurrency-related projects. Since Mitra has a built-in Monero donation module, I'm afraid they'd consider it a cryptocurrency-related project too.
@caohuak What's worse, Monero is not just a cryptocurrency. It's cryptocurrency for criminals!
@silverpill did you vote against it?
@happyborg No, I think only members of Codeberg organization can vote. I didn't even know this is being considered
@silverpill am pretty sure codeberg would welcome mitra. I might be wrong but to me, this statement is wide to be able to ban crypto projects which are 95% scams. Did you ask codeberg team?
@lutindiscret @happyborg I don't feel that mitra is unwelcome there, my interactions with Codeberg team have been mostly pleasant. But I also don't want to count on favorable interpretations.
I didn't ask, but somebody else mentioned mitra in a discussion 7 months ago, and was ignored: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2184#issuecomment-8629041
@lutindiscret @happyborg I don't feel that mitra is unwelcome there, my interactions with Codeberg team have been mostly pleasant. But I also don't want to count on favorable interpretations.
I didn't ask, but somebody else mentioned mitra in a discussion 7 months ago, and was ignored: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2184#issuecomment-8629041
@lutindiscret @happyborg I don't feel that mitra is unwelcome there, my interactions with Codeberg team have been mostly pleasant. But I also don't want to count on favorable interpretations.
I didn't ask, but somebody else mentioned mitra in a discussion 7 months ago, and was ignored: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2184#issuecomment-8629041
@happyborg No, I think only members of Codeberg organization can vote. I didn't even know this is being considered
@silverpill So does that mean anything for us that are on #Mitra servers?
@silverpill So does that mean anything for us that are on #Mitra servers?
@jody_racer No, servers are completely independent.
Migration to another forge may affect discoverability of the project, but in general I don't rely too much on Codeberg. By the way, Mitra now has federated groups, which can be used instead of an issue tracker: @mitra_support
@jody_racer No, servers are completely independent.
Migration to another forge may affect discoverability of the project, but in general I don't rely too much on Codeberg. By the way, Mitra now has federated groups, which can be used instead of an issue tracker: @mitra_support
We also explicitly do not tolerate:
...
Content that harms the reputation of Codeberg, such as cryptocurrency related projects.
That's particularly funny. Nothing harms your reputation as much as policies inspired by stupid ragebait like web3isgoinggreat.com
We also explicitly do not tolerate:
...
Content that harms the reputation of Codeberg, such as cryptocurrency related projects.
That's particularly funny. Nothing harms your reputation as much as policies inspired by stupid ragebait like web3isgoinggreat.com
