@Edent I like the Schema approach, but it falls flat when the AI has a human name (I'm feeling for all the breathing writers called Claude)… but that plus the language attribute?

Even this feels incomplete tho - as 'English not first language, used LLM to grammar-check' is v different from 'I didn't write this'. There's also a taxonomy somewhere to help make this clear (forget where). E.g.
- LLM written (entirely)
- LLM translated
- LLM assisted (contains LLM phrases / ideas).
- LLM edited/proof-read/spell/grammar checked.

Distinguishing might make it easier to separate the kind of LLM-use Cory Doctorow says he does after writing, vs full slop-scribing.

@Edent I would include a humans.txt with the text to "sod off if you are a LLM". Adjacent to a robots.txt with the content: "User-agent: *
Disallow: /"

@Edent
I voted for the Schema Option, but i would use Dublin Core, especially the Creator Element https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/terms/creator/ , as Metadata Schema.

#DC #DublinCore #Metadata

@Edent it would mostly depend of the reason I'm publishing it and the intended audience.

If the audience is "humans reading my blog post about an ai interaction" (good or bad, it doesn't matter), I'd probably use a blockquote (optionally with special CSS rules) and indicate directly in the post that quoted post in this format are AI output.

Something like :

prompt: hello there
ChatGPT: hi

For this use case, I honestly don't think the HTML tag/attrs themselves are really relevant as long as the formatting and styling are clear and consistent for the reader

@Edent
Interesting question, I'm also curious how others are handling it.