there are helicopters twice a day overhead. i assume the noise sends a message. every time, a single neuron is diverted into ensuring the blades of fascism recede into the distance. twice now, i have envisioned an alternative, which quickly requires active thought aversion.
Discussion
Replies:
15
Boosts:
3
people whose actual job is publishing papers said it mystified them. that itself is a data point indicating that falsification and corpo deskilling is not just artificial but recent and accelerating.
this was all before twitter inc too lmao
because academic journals hear [read in kpop singer voice]:
hacker and doctor team up to take on cell differentiation and wrote their own analysis stack
and think [very evil hot queer villain voice]:
that sucks, nobody wants to hear that the expensive software that sucks is also wrong. you boy, throw some more copies of nature into the undergraduate dogfighting pit. add some sauce
[she's queer coded bc she will be joining our team later after we convince her that we are the one lab that doesn't lie. she will propose that we simply lie instead but we then explain that people will die and she gets all pouty but in the final battle she explains how we showed her how to hope and love. and she's also a hotshot biologist and we build mech suits together. platonically]
i don't ever again want to read a paper taking biopsies from unnamed dead people to chuck into the "literally data fabrication, this used to be illegal" machine. i'm removing a variable sized portion of your flesh for each dimension it reduces and pulling out a hair each time it adds noise to look more sciencey
if communion is jesus blood and flesh i guess that makes everyone who entrusted me to read their entrails was a legion of jesuses and i have like 17 free sins now sick
illegal black market prison economy of sin forgiveness vouchers that jesus and st. peter actually accept and vouch for. wardens in shambles. cigarette company CEO flees the country
i want to know academic journals that respect the contract we signed in blood with patients. i want to know academic journals who understand all the incentives against publishing cross-domain collaborative methods, who think hacker resistance is when computers are twisted to serve scientists—who, yes, are the underdogs now (big mistake)
hey isn't it so crazy how i keep finding tons of data falsification in completely separate areas of research? it does kinda sound like lots of money revolves around lies and the continuing construction of legitimacy. i mention legitimacy because i really do need people to say "google and microsoft are wartime assets of the us security state" whenever anyone legitimizes any form of collaborative work with or around them
read the BDS list for a thorough and profound set of receipts. i'm not here with receipts i think people should vilify and delegitimize microsoft and google open source. also if they touch the bytes you publish to your users you are exposing your users to an attack surface you can't reproduce (bc of the chainguard DRM scheme which is just a service that prints a checkbox you can't reproduce without the DRM)
(if you work at google or ms and you can read this please don't take it personally and also just make them pay you more if they're gonna make you accept moral injury)
