Discussion
1/
Based just on anecdotal evidence: it seems surprisingly common for scientists to be told by funders, managers, or policy people that mentioning #uncertainty or limitations “complicates” the message or weakens its impact [1]. (Days ago, yet another colleague shared a story on this, with other scientists nodding along, recalling similar moments happened to them)
But here's the thing: without uncertainty and "steady doubt", #science "zombifies" back into the default historical #hubris mindset
2/
This attitude reminds the first, perhaps most obvious, of the four "coping strategies" on #uncertainty in the #SciencePolicyInterface, as discussed by @Jeroen_van_der_Sluijs [2]
"Monster-exorcists want to expel the monster. Uncertainty simply does not fit within symbolical order where #science is seen as the producer of authoritative objective #knowledge" [2]
Variant: "keeping the uncertainties in knowledge claims deliberately under the table because they do not fit a political agenda" [2]
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate
