If you're a subscriber to the New York Times, how does it make you feel that the Times insists you pay extra to read sports news?
Discussion
If you're a subscriber to the New York Times, how does it make you feel that the Times insists you pay extra to read sports news?
@dangillmor For me the annoying thing was that I was signed up for emails from The Athletic — automatically, I think, as I don’t remember doing this. This resulted in a stream of emails with links to articles that I couldn’t read. It felt like an upsell. Of course I turned that off. Still annoying is the continual upsell for sports, cooking, games etc. Upsell, upsell, upsell.
@dangillmor And the mini-crossword, and most of its games/puzzles, ...
One of my daughters worked as an app developer for The Athletic pre-NYT ownership. Once it was acquired, she started looking elsewhere for employment and quickly found it. She was lucky to have such easily transferrable skills. A lesson for us all.
@dangillmor
Not only do I not subscribe to the Nazi sympathizing NYT, but I have them flagged in Kagi to place their articles at the bottom of any search results.
@dangillmor I would pay extra to NOT see sports news, as Apple tries to ram down our throats.
@dangillmor I don't read sport news, but #nyt also put the wordlebot behind the pay-extra-wall. Now, that's annoying.
@dangillmor
Second question:
If you're working at the New York Times, how does it make you feel that make people pay extra to read sports news?
@dangillmor
Like you shouldn't be a Times subscriber anymore, I'd expect.
@dangillmor That they nuked their sports desk a couple years ago was one of the reason I dropped my subscription last year. I didn't care that they were publishing the overwritten pieces from the Athletic. I just wanted a GD Yankees beat writer rather than the AP wire feed.
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate