@liaizon Personally, I might even be okay with a corporate sponsorship / takeover of Audacity. 🙊
We're all aware of the path to enshittification caused by corporations in their products, but in this case wouldn't the GPL license apply a pressure to mitigate this? The work being done is still open, whether or not the corporate sponsor gets a reward via what is basically an ad. E.g. I still am grateful for Firefox in keeping alive the only web engine competitor to Chrome, despite their corporate interests. In this case, I don't see the Audacity v4 roadmap as being focused on their corporate interests, it seems focused on being a better audio editor.
Those who disagree can always fork, i.e. Tenacity, and the situation might even light a fire to contribute. Meanwhile developers need money to live, I've been involved with many open source projects (e.g. Scuttlebutt) that subsist on values more than money, it's not always a great time, mostly involves volunteers burning out.