Discussion
Loading...

Discussion

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Darius Kazemi
@darius@friend.camp  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

I'm sure other people have noted this but at some point we went from talking about "social network sites" to talking about "social media sites".

At first, the network was the thing that mattered. Then, the media was the thing that mattered.

A quick Google Trends query shows the shift might have happened around 2012:

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=%22social%20network%20site%22,%22social%20media%20site%22&hl=en

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
scott jon siegel
@numberless@xoxo.zone replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius I have feelings and opinions about this but you know that already

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Timo Tijhof
@krinkle@fosstodon.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius

The suffix "site" was/is uncommon in my circles.

Without it, the data suggests that "social media" won by 2009, with "social network" only rising later in 2010, and then disappearing as quickly as it came by 2012.

The Social Network (2010 film) might have prompted that.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=%22social%20network%22,%22social%20media%22&hl=en

Sorry, no caption provided by author
Sorry, no caption provided by author
Sorry, no caption provided by author
Sorry, no caption provided by author
Sorry, no caption provided by author
Sorry, no caption provided by author
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
tom jennings
@tomjennings@tldr.nettime.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius

Oh that's interesting.

But I sort of agree, that's what the big corporate sites, FB, insta, tiktok, have become.

Let them have the name. And let's not do those things.

It's similar to the insight into why music, moving image, text, became "content". It speaks to nothing of that, but of them, but the *container*.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jordan Biserkov
@jbiserkov@mas.to replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius Without the "site" part the trend is even more pronounced, perhaps due to a popular film of that name. https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=social%20media,social%20network&hl=en

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Robert W. Gehl
@rwg@aoir.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius This actually affected the history of alternative social media, as well. @rra have a forthcoming paper that talks about this

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Robert W. Gehl
@rwg@aoir.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius @rra the original alternatives all noted that "social networking" should not involve a center, so they often worked on making peer-to-peer architectures.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Rupert V/
@rupert@mastodon.nz replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius Wouldn't have been anything wrong with a program that crawled for updates to my friends' .plan files and displayed it as a web page.
Except no-one would have made billions off it.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Evan Prodromou
@evan@cosocial.ca replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius I think I like my social network more than I like social media.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
clarity flowers
@clarity@xoxo.zone replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius feels like we should really be calling them "media marketplaces" these days

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jez 🍞🌹
@petrichor@digipres.club replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius Well, Marshal McLuhan did say that the medium is the message... 🤔

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Cogito ergo mecagoendios
@elrohir@mastodon.gal replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius I think this mostly comes from the influencer phenomenon and the UI sherpherding people from a "symmetric frienship" use-case towards an "asymmetric monetized fans" use case.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Ignacio (he) 🇪🇸🇺🇦🇪🇺
@icg937@mstdn.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius That didn't happen in Spanish, we've always said «redes sociales» so far.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
william.maggos
@wjmaggos@liberal.city replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius @Gargron

and I'm glad. public to the world. like a blog. decentralized social media is about the people deciding what gets attention. boosts. that's really important. it's a fix for owners of big media and advertisers dominating culture. imo we should embrace this. #DemocracyOfReach

social networking is humans connecting. important but not necessarily visible to a third party. it could also be a text or phone call.

to me, social media is OG twitter while a social network is more FB.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Richard MacManus
@ricmac@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius Remember it was “social software” in the early 2000s, when the blogosphere was young and thriving. But that was always too geeky a term.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
occvlt
@occvlt@m.sanctv.net replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius I wonder what happened in 2012?

https://techcrunch.com/2012/04/09/facebook-to-acquire-instagram-for-1-billion/

04/09/2012 “Facebook Buys Instagram For $1 Billion, Turns Budding Rival Into Its Standalone Photo App”

TechCrunch

Facebook Buys Instagram For $1 Billion, Turns Budding Rival Into Its Standalone Photo App | TechCrunch

Facebook has just finished a deal to acquire mobile photo sharing app Instagram for approximately $1 billion in cash and stock. Instagram will remain an independently branded standalone app that's separate from Facebook, but the services will increase their ties to each other. The transaction should go through this quarter pending some standard closing procedures Last year, documents for a standalone Facebook mobile photo sharing app were attained by TechCrunch. Now it seems Facebook would rather buy Instagram which comes with a built-in community of photographers and photo lovers, while simultaneously squashing a threat to its dominance in photo sharing.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
allison
@aparrish@friend.camp replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius i'm old enough to remember when it was called "social software"

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Sean Bala
@seanbala@mas.to replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius Seriously interesting point!

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Григорий Клюшников
@grishka@friends.grishka.me replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

It's very language-dependent. I've only noticed this in English. In Russian there isn't such a distinction — the only thing that happened over time was that "социальные сети" (social networks) got shortened to "соцсети". Which makes VKontakte's recent onslaught of enshittification all the more ridiculous, because we don't even have a term for a "social network" that puts the network (the friend list in the newly redesigned profiles) behind two extra clicks.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Gracious Anthracite
@anthracite@dragon.style replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius

...I have not noticed that and you're right. Huh.

I wonder when people started calling all their work "content".

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Dave Winer ☕️
@davew@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius

related -- "social web" is totally overused.

there is a social web, we just haven't developed very much of it, i think because we were intimidated by the silos. i'm not intimidated any more, i'm fed up and going ahead without them.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Dave Winer ☕️
@davew@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius

social network is way more empowering. saying it's media positions people as watchers. that is what it has become, but we should strive to make networks that enable us to work together.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Darius Kazemi
@darius@friend.camp replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@davew Yeah, the web became kind of Neil Postman-ized in the "Amusing Ourselves to Death" sense

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Guy LeCharles Gonzalez
@glecharles@gardenstate.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius Remove "site" from both queries and the difference is even bigger and more glaring.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=%22social%20network%22,%22social%20media%22&hl=en

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Darius Kazemi
@darius@friend.camp replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@glecharles yeah I actually added "site" because the results are pretty polluted by the popular 2010 movie The Social Network

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Guy LeCharles Gonzalez
@glecharles@gardenstate.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius It's interesting that didn't have any staying power and social media dominated.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
James Smith 💾
@Floppy@mastodon.me.uk replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago

@darius that’s why I recently changed our site tagline from social media back to social networking. Taking it back! 😀

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1-alpha.8 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login