@bosak It looks like they already have that document logged.

It contains a copy of one of my favorite Doug Engelbart papers and diagrams!

I think of an Engelbart style Journal as a space to record, cite, and link dialog, external references, and knowledge products for some continuing, broadly defined purposes of an organization or individual.

CODIAK process, Doug Engelbart (1992)
dougengelbart.org/content/view

archive.org/details/BootstrapC

A diagram of Doug Engelbarts CONccurrent Development, Integration, & Application of Knowledge process. (CODIAK). It shows three categories of information arranged in three vertical columns: 

Dialog Records: memos, status reports, change requests, commentary, design reviews, etc. 

External Intelligence: Articles, books, reports, papers, competition, supplier and customer info, new technologies, trip reports, etc.

Knowledge Products: Proposals, plans, budgets, legal contracts, design specs, Mfg plans, test plans and results, etc.

Arrows lead from Dialog Records to Knowledge Products and in the opposite direction, indicating how dialog leveraging external intelligence both supports creation of knowledge products and is a primary subject of a continuing stream of dialog.
GIF
A diagram of Doug Engelbarts CONccurrent Development, Integration, & Application of Knowledge process. (CODIAK). It shows three categories of information arranged in three vertical columns: Dialog Records: memos, status reports, change requests, commentary, design reviews, etc. External Intelligence: Articles, books, reports, papers, competition, supplier and customer info, new technologies, trip reports, etc. Knowledge Products: Proposals, plans, budgets, legal contracts, design specs, Mfg plans, test plans and results, etc. Arrows lead from Dialog Records to Knowledge Products and in the opposite direction, indicating how dialog leveraging external intelligence both supports creation of knowledge products and is a primary subject of a continuing stream of dialog.

@bosak 🧵Engelbart blue numbers

How great it is to use a W3C standard link to a particular item in a report published 33 years ago in a 57 year old hypertext system using a Web interface created about 30 years ago.

While the rest of the world randomly trashes links created 5 years ago, or whenever the last juice is squeezed from an article by a once famous author writing for a once respected publisher by any of a myriad of private equity predators.