@davidgerard I haven't gone looking (because I have the skills to write my own) but I have had newbie/junior staff tell me they've used "AI" to craft SQL for them.

So far it's been the same kind of won't-work or will-give-wrong results script that this type of person always writes - and that I have to fix/re-teach.

But, while I see lots of guff about generation of "programming" code, I've not seen claims about SQL generation.

So, are there claims I perhaps should know about?

@nopatience @davidgerard “I think in the future, if you don’t have glasses that have AI — or some way to interact with AI — I think you’re … probably [going to] be at a pretty significant cognitive disadvantage compared to other people,” Zuckerberg added.

This is so fucking funny to me. If I don’t outsource my thinking to a pair of glasses, I’m going to be at a cognitive disadvantage? One that evaporates as soon as I put the glasses on, right?

Because AI is so easy to use and time saving, according to them I’ll be able to pick it right up… It’s not like I need to attend a 2-year AI prompting bootcamp or something. Because it’s magic and conversational and knows all the answers for me! (/sarcasm, just in case)

So yeah, Zuck, I’ll just wait and then pop on the magic brain glasses the minute I witness myself being left behind. (I will never need to do this.)

@seekingfreedom @davidgerard

I always try and picture the person behind the words, what are they thinking, what are they envisioning?

What cognitive strap-on will be so powerful that not having it will feel as if you're 'cognitively disadvantaged'?

I would argue that you'll (eventually) be at such a massively cognitive disadvantage IF YOU WEAR them because it would appear as if you can stop thinking entirely...

... and exactly where the line should be drawn between AR and AI... not quite so sure how glasses will ... I don't know.

I look forward to learning how the population of earth will mentally decline because we're not wearing mansplainer tooling.