Not all open source contributions are code contributions.
Not all open source contributions are code contributions.
it suggests value of a contribution emerges equally from a wide range of fields, but because of the imbalance of power that comes with code projects that is not true most of the time.
Technically nothing is wrong with that stance, though. But it still sucks to be the non-coder in open source. big time. 🤷♂️
What’s wrong with the suggestion that the“value of a contribution emerges equally from a wide range of fields?” Sure there’s an imbalance of power, but I’m saying that imbalance shouldn’t exist.
I read it more as a motivation for more diverse people to join, than encouraging coders to value efforts of non-coders.
Advocacy, especially outside of the bubble, is also severely underrated.
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate