Discussion
B3
What was missing in the OPEN SYSTEMS case study
quoted by post B2 of this tentative thread
i.e. a Civil Society <--> Computing GATEWAY concept
is missing when OPEN SOURCE advocates claim they deliver SOVEREIGNTY
https://mastodon.uno/@osi@opensource.org/115604104170202815
without NON-BUSINESS-USER FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
HOW CAN DIGITAL AUTONOMY be granted?
The Italian UNDERSTANDING of this tentative thread
[i.e.: translation + TRANSDUCTION]
has been pending
since the Web was born at CERN
B2
Italiano in ALT
CERN acted as a gatekeeper
between its distributed user community and digital system vendors since the 60ies
A digital solution "generative" approach for the "open system" case could not be taken by Commission and ICT industry
as per https://aei.pitt.edu/63632/
a "CERN like" gatekeeper role was out of scope for standard bodies work plans
This case study should be used to understand why the European aim towards an OPEN SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT aborted
B3
What was missing in the OPEN SYSTEMS case study
quoted by post B2 of this tentative thread
i.e. a Civil Society <--> Computing GATEWAY concept
is missing when OPEN SOURCE advocates claim they deliver SOVEREIGNTY
https://mastodon.uno/@osi@opensource.org/115604104170202815
without NON-BUSINESS-USER FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
HOW CAN DIGITAL AUTONOMY be granted?
The Italian UNDERSTANDING of this tentative thread
[i.e.: translation + TRANSDUCTION]
has been pending
since the Web was born at CERN
B4
IF
Big Tech
GATEKEEPERS
referenced by
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_2717
are designated by the EC
for their services to act as
GATEWAYS
between businesses and consumers
THEN
European territorial GATEKEEPERS
should be designated for services acting as GATEWAYS
between citizens and computing
ELSE
?? guess what !!
Rewording Rephrasing & Localisation contributions in high demand !!
