Discussion
"Decolonisation is sometimes presented, not as an attempt to resurrect the dispassionate search for knowledge, but as a rejection of the idea of objectivity, which is seen as a sort of heritage of colonial thinking.
[but]
One can reject universal truths without endorsing relativism."
#AlexBroadbent, University of Johannesburg, 2017
WTAF is this rubbish?
Politics, economics, sociology and cultural studies are all areas of academic inquiry, not things that are tangential to its ideals
Given that most things that aren't covered by the above areas are affected by them - arts, science, literature, technology, history, etc - by virtue of the fact that they exist with societies that are shaped by political, economic and cultural forces, I'm left struggling to grasp what this moron is trying to say.
I'm guessing you're feeling really challenged by this article, and inclined to defend whatever you think is being attacked. I suspect that defensive impulse is worth unpacking a bit, to see what might be in there driving it. I'll leave you to it.
> Decolonisation is sometimes presented.... as a rejection of the idea of objectivity, which is seen as a sort of heritage of colonial thinking.
The article does nothing to dispel that. "Objectivity" is central to the identity of western intellectual traditions (I only really know that tradition) and is mostly misunderstood
(1/2)
@worik
> The article does nothing to dispel that
Oh it absolutely does.
> "Objectivity" is central to the identity of western intellectual traditions
That in itself is a colonial idea. Every culture is capable of discovering and utilising knowledge frameworks like "objectivity". As the article says, about half way down, decolonising knowledge has nothing to do with the absolute relativism of the postmodernists.
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate