@nokke
> Good old port 25 is the Achilles heal. Email ports are just too easy to target for any regime

This too seems like a good argument for using XMPP instead, or especially Matrix, which is a web protocol. So I presume it would be harder to fingerprint than either email or XMPP.

> the DC devs are playing fast and loose with their users

That's my impression too. But what I'm wondering is, why?

Anyway, all this is by way of example. In terms of what you can do, if you do work at a local business, or you do volunteer at a cool nonprofit, please ask folks to make data available to the community by publishing RSS feeds and iCalendar feeds and the like.

There's a better internet that is within our reach, and we've seen glances of what that looks like in the past. It's not gone, we can bring that forward into the present.

@Tutanota @robpike Google has been scanning your emails since forever. This is not news.

@s0 @abrasive @voltagex @Unixbigot @projectgus The major factor is the flux core in solder wires. Use a touch extra flux and it gets much easier.

@1password I’m a family customer and cannot begin to express how disappointed I am with your sponsorship of Omarchy, an organisation led by DHH, a white nationalist who has outright called for the ethnic cleansing of Europe.

I’m just one subscription, but if you continue this, I won’t be giving you any more of my money so that you can pass it on to such people.

@nokke
> Good old port 25 is the Achilles heal. Email ports are just too easy to target for any regime

This too seems like a good argument for using XMPP instead, or especially Matrix, which is a web protocol. So I presume it would be harder to fingerprint than either email or XMPP.

So it's come to my attention that many of you do not, in fact, have local copies of your email, relying solely on your cloud providers not to lock you out?

That's crazy to me. I have meticulously exported and reimported my IMAP mailboxes every time I switched provider, and keep local copies in a Maildir that goes back all the way to 2002.

Not only does this allow me to use powerful tools like mu, but I'm also not at the mercy of $TECH_COMPANY.

@s0 @abrasive @voltagex @Unixbigot @projectgus Even though SnPb does work easier than other blends (except for maybe SnBi which you probably won't use outside of re-work), I try to avoid it given the kids in the house and the high toxicity. These days I'm usually working with paste on SMT components so there's little difference between using SnPb and SAC305 apart from the higher temperature required. For wire-work, I find Sn99Cu is easier to use than SAC305 wire.

Happy first day of autumn! 🍂🍎🦔

@msbellows I get that a lot.

@jeremydmiller Somewhere along the line the meaning of CI changed for many teams to “I dunno, it sort of works in my IDE, I'll let GitHub Actions figure out if it's right or not” ... and I hate it. CI was never supposed to be that, it's just team laziness. CI was always "run precisely the same checks on a neutral environment that I've already run on my machine; with all the latest changes currently on (or about to be) on the main branch; and do that frequently”. It was only supposed to fail if something had been either (a) missed in the environment dependencies, (b) a semantic conflict in two commits merged since the last CI run, (c) an external failure.

Of course CI as an idea “is failing” if people are centralizing the checks of all their barely baked code, and they're generating 100 times as many LoCs as they were (some of which might even be useful).

Anyway, I know you know all this.

@GeePawHill Pretty sure we answered that final question in the affirmative a long time ago, my friend.

@arcanechat
> as of why not xmpp etc., well it is a historical reason, what protocol is used internally is not the main driver for users but the features set

Protocol choice determines who you can talk to using the app. It's hardly unimportant. It also determines which features can be supported. Eg both Matrix and XMPP have ways of handling voice/video, which AFAIK ChatMail lacks

> DC is made in a way the protocol could be change

So why stick with ChatMail? That's the question I'm asking.