Discussion
Loading...

#Tag

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Different Than
@guyjantic@infosec.exchange  ·  activity timestamp 18 hours ago

Arrival (2016). It is one of my very favorite #movies. It's got so much going for it, but one big thing is its treatment of #GenderRoles. If you saw it and didn't notice that, then the director and actors succeeded. It's all about Amy Adams' character, one of the most amazing #feminist performances I've ever seen, though I didn't notice this until my second or third viewing.

Adams' performance is off-the-charts solid, the kind that draws little attention, will cause some men in the audience to make sour faces, and will (I think?) make some women feel other things. OK, yes, she's hot, but other other things. Things about women and how they might be and sometimes are.

As you can see, I'm not explaining well. Trying again: Adams' performance is of an academic who knows what her skills are and also has a bit of bluster, but a quiet kind. She just knows she is smarter, in specific ways, than anyone else around her; she has expertise and is comfortable with it. Other people in her lane can fuck off without her specifically telling them to, and maybe without even noticing they're getting out of her way. She's the interpersonal/academic equivalent of the guy who never moves an inch from his path in the sidewalk, confident that everyone else will move.

This kind of deep confidence is, in my experience, a predominantly masculine thing in movies, and apparently--from Hollywood's track record--difficult to pull off. Time and again I see "strong female characters" who are overly aggressive, defensively empowered, spewing their vulnerability over the audience, or something like that; I don't have the words. They and their directors are trying, and succeeding at some things, but not at this. Another excellent portrayal is Gal Godot's Wonder Woman, but that one almost cheats with a protagonist who can kick all the ass all the time (something that has also been done badly or kind-of-OK many times).

Adams simply is all the unthinking, deep-down assumptions and confidence that some men have. She shows no conflict about making her students stay in class when a disaster is happening. She is unapologetic in her negotiations with Forest Whitaker early in the movie. She takes action when she thinks it is warranted, rules or no, and even tells lies when she thinks it necessary. No apology in verbal, paraverbal, nonverbal, or even contextual cues. As I watch I am struck again with the realization: This is what men do.

Adams is not masculinized. She's not "trying to be like a man," much less a thin stereotype of a man--she shows fear and vulnerability often, for instance, though that doesn't steal the show or define her character; it seems perfectly in keeping with it, possibly because of how she displays it, again a thing we allow male protagonists then pretend we didn't see it or something. Adams simply inhabits some spaces that should be non-gendered, but which are mostly occupied by men. She steps into that space, she doesn't stomp into it. She steps in and doesn't step past it into someone's sociopolitical treatise. She does all this implicitly, as if she were unaware--though of course she, the actress, is deeply aware. She makes the impossible look effortless.

Jeremy Renner is in the movie, and he's more or less a support romantic type, a foil for some of the main character's words and actions, a necessary if unimportant piece in the plot. They put Hawkeye in a big movie and it wasn't remotely about him; he filled a space in Amy Adams' narrative the way women frequently do in men's narratives.

Forest Whitaker is amazing as the military colonel (? I don't know military ranks). Adams' character is not defined by contrast or comparison with him or anyone else; she doesn't "take him down a peg" or "show that women are just as strong as soldiers" or any such bullshit, because she doesn't need to. She simply exists as a person who knows what they have to offer and what they don't. Sometimes he's in the way.

When I write or talk about this I'm aware I don't have the language, or maybe even the concepts, to do it well, so I ramble (even more than usual). I'll stop. Of course I think everyone should go watch the movie, but I already said it's one of my favorites, so you knew I would say that.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2543164/

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
William Lindsey :toad:
@wdlindsy@toad.social  ·  activity timestamp 5 months ago

"It refers not only to Christian beliefs shared by the many different expressions of Christianity practiced around the country and world, but also to a particular set of social and cultural values. ...

'Traditional' understandings of gender and sexuality are one of the foundational cultural commitments of the particular expression of Christianity inherent to Christian nationalism."

#Trump #ChristianNationalism #gender #GenderRoles #misogyny #family
/9

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
William Lindsey :toad:
@wdlindsy@toad.social  ·  activity timestamp 5 months ago

"It includes these things, certainly, but the 'Christian' of Christian nationalism also brings with it what I like to call extra cultural baggage. So when proponents of Christian nationalism say they want to 'make America Christian,' the 'Christian' is doing a lot of heavy lifting."

#Trump #ChristianNationalism #gender #GenderRoles #misogyny #family
/8

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
William Lindsey :toad:
@wdlindsy@toad.social  ·  activity timestamp 5 months ago

"A desire for a society marked by traditionalist social hierarchies—primarily organized around gender and sexuality—is a foundational element of Christian nationalism. When I define Christian nationalism, I like to underscore that the 'Christian' of Christian nationalism doesn’t only refer to orthodox Christian teachings like 'Jesus is the Son of God,' or 'Jesus was resurrected on the third day.'”

#Trump #ChristianNationalism #gender #GenderRoles #misogyny #family
/7

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
William Lindsey :toad:
@wdlindsy@toad.social  ·  activity timestamp 5 months ago

"Using PRRI’s state-level estimates for proportion of the population who at the very least are sympathetic to Christian nationalism, we see a strong positive correlation with the percent who voted for Trump in 2024. ...

There was one particular set of issues that animated much of the Trump campaign leading up to the 2024 election: gender and sexuality."

#Trump #ChristianNationalism #gender #GenderRoles #misogyny #family
/6

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
William Lindsey :toad:
@wdlindsy@toad.social  ·  activity timestamp 5 months ago

Gayle's conclusion: Young men believe _ emphasis on "believe" — the world is leaving them behind and the right-wing is poised to scoop them up massaging their grievances.

Andrew Whitehead asks,

"Is Christian nationalism predictive of which states voted for Trump in 2024? Yes, yes it is."

#Trump #ChristianNationalism #gender #GenderRoles #misogyny #family
/5

https://andrewwhitehead.substack.com/p/gender-christian-nationalism-and

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0-rc.3.21 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login