#Tag
Log in
The Japan Times
The Japan Times
@thejapantimes@mastodon.social  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago
"Texts used as framing stimuli in the choice experiment. IMPORTANT: Research has shown that the best decisions are those that are made [intuitively and from the gut] [using logic and reasoned thinking]. In the following, we are interested in your [intuitive] [deliberate] decisions. Therefore, please decide in each case, as [spontaneously] [thoughtfully] as possible, from which of the two sellers you would buy."
"Texts used as framing stimuli in the choice experiment. IMPORTANT: Research has shown that the best decisions are those that are made [intuitively and from the gut] [using logic and reasoned thinking]. In the following, we are interested in your [intuitive] [deliberate] decisions. Therefore, please decide in each case, as [spontaneously] [thoughtfully] as possible, from which of the two sellers you would buy."
"Texts used as framing stimuli in the choice experiment. IMPORTANT: Research has shown that the best decisions are those that are made [intuitively and from the gut] [using logic and reasoned thinking]. In the following, we are interested in your [intuitive] [deliberate] decisions. Therefore, please decide in each case, as [spontaneously] [thoughtfully] as possible, from which of the two sellers you would buy."
"In the experiment, participants were confronted with a canceling problem. Specifically, they were asked to imagine that they are responsible for organizing a conference on ophthalmology. Due to a software error, two speakers have been mistakenly assigned to the last available speaking slot, and it is impossible to let both of them present. The task requires the participants to make a difficult decision: one of the two speakers must be removed from the list of presenters. Participants were informed that they had conducted online searches for both professional and personal information about the speakers and had a brief phone conversation with each to confirm their interest in presenting at the conference. They were also told that each speaker had made either a politically charged or a neutral statement, conveyed either during the private phone conversation or through a blog or social media post."
"In the experiment, participants were confronted with a canceling problem. Specifically, they were asked to imagine that they are responsible for organizing a conference on ophthalmology. Due to a software error, two speakers have been mistakenly assigned to the last available speaking slot, and it is impossible to let both of them present. The task requires the participants to make a difficult decision: one of the two speakers must be removed from the list of presenters. Participants were informed that they had conducted online searches for both professional and personal information about the speakers and had a brief phone conversation with each to confirm their interest in presenting at the conference. They were also told that each speaker had made either a politically charged or a neutral statement, conveyed either during the private phone conversation or through a blog or social media post."
"In the experiment, participants were confronted with a canceling problem. Specifically, they were asked to imagine that they are responsible for organizing a conference on ophthalmology. Due to a software error, two speakers have been mistakenly assigned to the last available speaking slot, and it is impossible to let both of them present. The task requires the participants to make a difficult decision: one of the two speakers must be removed from the list of presenters. Participants were informed that they had conducted online searches for both professional and personal information about the speakers and had a brief phone conversation with each to confirm their interest in presenting at the conference. They were also told that each speaker had made either a politically charged or a neutral statement, conveyed either during the private phone conversation or through a blog or social media post."
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago
"Among all types of attributes, clearly the class of politically incorrect statements stand out. Speakers that utter strong skepticism towards immigration have a 5.99% higher probability of getting cancelled than speakers that express their admiration for sunsets. Denying human-made climate change or expressing the belief in biologically grounded ability differences between the sexes lead also to a higher probability of getting cancelled (4.62% and 2.95%, respectively). In addition, the subjects take into consideration the reach of the (controversial) statements...." "...the reflective treatment consistently results in a higher probability of canceling across all politically incorrect statements, thereby confirming H1. This is most pronounced for statements related to immigration and climate change. The finding suggests that when induced to think about their decisions, subjects may feel a greater responsibility to adhere to social norms regarding political correctness."
"Among all types of attributes, clearly the class of politically incorrect statements stand out. Speakers that utter strong skepticism towards immigration have a 5.99% higher probability of getting cancelled than speakers that express their admiration for sunsets. Denying human-made climate change or expressing the belief in biologically grounded ability differences between the sexes lead also to a higher probability of getting cancelled (4.62% and 2.95%, respectively). In addition, the subjects take into consideration the reach of the (controversial) statements...." "...the reflective treatment consistently results in a higher probability of canceling across all politically incorrect statements, thereby confirming H1. This is most pronounced for statements related to immigration and climate change. The finding suggests that when induced to think about their decisions, subjects may feel a greater responsibility to adhere to social norms regarding political correctness."
"Among all types of attributes, clearly the class of politically incorrect statements stand out. Speakers that utter strong skepticism towards immigration have a 5.99% higher probability of getting cancelled than speakers that express their admiration for sunsets. Denying human-made climate change or expressing the belief in biologically grounded ability differences between the sexes lead also to a higher probability of getting cancelled (4.62% and 2.95%, respectively). In addition, the subjects take into consideration the reach of the (controversial) statements...." "...the reflective treatment consistently results in a higher probability of canceling across all politically incorrect statements, thereby confirming H1. This is most pronounced for statements related to immigration and climate change. The finding suggests that when induced to think about their decisions, subjects may feel a greater responsibility to adhere to social norms regarding political correctness."
Charlie Stross
Charlie Stross
@cstross@wandering.shop  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago
JdeBP
JdeBP
@JdeBP@mastodon.scot  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago
Is Russia's Demographic Future Already SEALED?
The Japan Times
The Japan Times
@thejapantimes@mastodon.social  ·  activity timestamp 4 months ago