Every major software project should appoint a UX Czar who has the authority to kill a feature if they have reason to believe it will royally piss off any more than a mere fraction of the userbase of the product.
New features should always benefit *a reasonable subset* of the total users of the product.
Either that, or release the possibly-hated feature as a totally optional add-on and make it clear that it's optional.
This feels like it shouldn't be rocket science… 🙃
AI slop is being imposed on an unwilling user base for reasons other than feature development.
AI slop is spyware.
AI slop is fossil fuel funded fascism.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielcohen/2025/11/26/saudi-arabias-push-for-ai-remains-a-challenge/
Petrostate despots and #PrinceBonesaw assure us that AI isn't malign.
https://www.arabnews.jp/en/saudi-arabia/article_162676/
https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/02/tech/saudi-arabia-ai-powerhouse
The worst vulture capitalists...
Doesn't everyone want a AI automated nuclear war?