Building more with GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-1-codex-max/

#HackerNews #Building #GPT5.1 #CodexMax #OpenAI #Innovation

GPT-5.1: A smarter, more conversational ChatGPT

https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-1/

#HackerNews #GPT5.1 #ChatGPT #AI #Conversational #Technology #Innovation

@nicole @mjd

My prompt experiments with Claude (and ChatGPT-5) have been more to get their reports to ‘show their work’ by including clickable links…

Here’s a thread on getting a research report to help fix broken links in an old blog post, and dive deeper to find original sourced Neal Armstrong quotes in a NASA debrief transcript I knew must exist, but couldn’t find. https://federate.social/@Roundtrip/115062497251838137

#LLM #Claude #gpt5

Reverse engineering Codex CLI to get GPT-5-Codex-Mini to draw me a pelican

https://simonwillison.net/2025/Nov/9/gpt-5-codex-mini/

#HackerNews #ReverseEngineering #CodexCLI #GPT5 #CodexMini #Pelican #AIArt

🗣️ OpenAI Announces That It's Making GPT-5 More Sycophantic After User Backlash

｢ Those who had become accustomed to the "sycophantic" tone of GPT-4o, which sometimes lavished praise even on users' terrible ideas, were taken aback by GPT-5's "cold" brashness and short answers, highlighting just how emotionally attached many of them had become ｣

https://futurism.com/openai-gpt5-more-sycophantic

#ai#gpt4 #gpt5

GPT-5 reaction amongst developers has been...mixed. In fact one of the developers OpenAI featured on its launch-day promotions has done a complete 180 — he now says he was wrong about GPT-5 (Theo Browne). Questions of coding quality aside, GPT-5 raises some interesting longer term questions for devs: if AI can build things just using web standards, will that lead to less reliance on React frameworks? https://thenewstack.io/gpt-5-a-choose-your-own-adventure-for-frontend-developers/ #gpt5 #frontend

Plus ($20/mo.) ChatGPT users can choose to use GPT-4o and not be forced to use GPT-5 without testing it first. Go to Settings > General and switch "Show legacy models" on.
Not available for Free users, at least yet.

I'll try to make this it for GPT-5 posts today 😅
#GenAI#ChatGPT#LLMs#GPT5

openai put a deceptive graph... on the slide about how gpt-5 deceives users less than previous generations

the jokes write themselves at this point

#gpt5

openai put a deceptive graph... on the slide about how gpt-5 deceives users less than previous generations

the jokes write themselves at this point

#gpt5

"I believe GPT-5 is part of a larger process happening in generative AI — enshittification, Cory Doctorow’s term for when platforms start out burning money offering an unlimited, unguarded experience to attract their users, then degrade and move features to higher tiers as a means of draining the blood from users.

With the launch of GPT-5, OpenAI has fully committed to enshittifying its consumer and business subscription products, arbitrarily moving free users to a cheaper model and limiting their ability to generate images, and removing the ability to choose which model you use in its $20, $35 and “enterprise” subscriptions, moving any and all choice to its “team” and $200-a-month “pro” subscriptions.

OpenAI’s justification is an exercise in faux-altruism, framing “taking away all choice” as a “real-time router that quickly decides which [model] to use.” ChatGPT Plus and Team members now mostly have access to two models — GPT-5 and GPT-5-Thinking — down from the six they had before.

This distinction is quite significant. Where users once could get hundreds of messages a day on OpenAI’s o4-mini-high and o4-mini reasoning models, GPT-5 for ChatGPT Plus subscribers offers 200 reasoning (GPT-5-thinking) messages a week, with 80 GPT-5 messages every 3 hours which allow you to ask it to “think” about its answer, shoving you over to an undisclosed reasoning model. This may seem like a good deal, OpenAI is likely putting you on the cheapest model whenever it can in the name of “the best choice.”"

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-enshittification-of-generative-ai/

#AI#GenerativeAI#OpenAI#ChatGPT#GPT5#Enshittification

"I believe GPT-5 is part of a larger process happening in generative AI — enshittification, Cory Doctorow’s term for when platforms start out burning money offering an unlimited, unguarded experience to attract their users, then degrade and move features to higher tiers as a means of draining the blood from users.

With the launch of GPT-5, OpenAI has fully committed to enshittifying its consumer and business subscription products, arbitrarily moving free users to a cheaper model and limiting their ability to generate images, and removing the ability to choose which model you use in its $20, $35 and “enterprise” subscriptions, moving any and all choice to its “team” and $200-a-month “pro” subscriptions.

OpenAI’s justification is an exercise in faux-altruism, framing “taking away all choice” as a “real-time router that quickly decides which [model] to use.” ChatGPT Plus and Team members now mostly have access to two models — GPT-5 and GPT-5-Thinking — down from the six they had before.

This distinction is quite significant. Where users once could get hundreds of messages a day on OpenAI’s o4-mini-high and o4-mini reasoning models, GPT-5 for ChatGPT Plus subscribers offers 200 reasoning (GPT-5-thinking) messages a week, with 80 GPT-5 messages every 3 hours which allow you to ask it to “think” about its answer, shoving you over to an undisclosed reasoning model. This may seem like a good deal, OpenAI is likely putting you on the cheapest model whenever it can in the name of “the best choice.”"

https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-enshittification-of-generative-ai/

#AI#GenerativeAI#OpenAI#ChatGPT#GPT5#Enshittification

Apple conferma: ChatGPT in Apple Intelligence userà GPT-5 con iOS 26, iPadOS 26 e macOS 26. 🍏 Miglioramenti vocali, video, coding e ragionamento avanzato. Attivabile da Impostazioni. #AppleIntelligence#GPT5#iOS26

🎈 GPT-5 Users Say It Seriously Sucks

｢ But many users say GPT-5 is far from the generational leap that its moniker would suggest. It's more of a mix of steps forward and steps back, prompting widespread speculation that OpenAI is trying to keep costs down. After all, running large language models is a notoriously energy-intensive — and environmentally destructive — process ｣

https://futurism.com/gpt-5-sucks

#openai #gpt5 #ai

The sound of thousands of academics scrambling to rerun their experiments now that their papers about to be submitted (not to mention their previously published ones) have become unexpectedly obsolete.

#gpt5

"I speculated that transformer performance would converge on not-quite-good-enough. Needs more work. See me after. Not so much 'super-intelligence' as 'super-mediocrity'."

#gpt5

https://codemanship.wordpress.com/2025/01/11/the-llm-in-the-room/

The time is upon as, folks. If anyone doubted that LLMs have hit a performance wall, it's undeniable today. This is as good as they're gonna get, and it ain't good enough.

"I speculated that transformer performance would converge on not-quite-good-enough. Needs more work. See me after. Not so much 'super-intelligence' as 'super-mediocrity'."

#gpt5

https://codemanship.wordpress.com/2025/01/11/the-llm-in-the-room/

The time is upon as, folks. If anyone doubted that LLMs have hit a performance wall, it's undeniable today. This is as good as they're gonna get, and it ain't good enough.