Alejandro Baez
@zeab@fosstodon.org  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago
alcinnz boosted
Jan :rust: :ferris:
@janriemer@floss.social  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago
Jan :rust: :ferris:
@janriemer@floss.social  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago
wakest ⁂ and 1 other boosted
p2panda
@p2panda@autonomous.zone  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago
A diagram showing a directed acyclic graph where different authors published their operations in, every operation is a node in the graph, the edges point at the previously "seen" operations of all authors. We can “lock in” the group state from this moment on and agree on finality: Every change which will be applied into that “past” will be considered byzantine behaviour and illegal. This “fork the past” we also call equivocation and consensus protocols like that can help us to detect and mitigate them.
A diagram showing a directed acyclic graph where different authors published their operations in, every operation is a node in the graph, the edges point at the previously "seen" operations of all authors. We can “lock in” the group state from this moment on and agree on finality: Every change which will be applied into that “past” will be considered byzantine behaviour and illegal. This “fork the past” we also call equivocation and consensus protocols like that can help us to detect and mitigate them.
A diagram showing a directed acyclic graph where different authors published their operations in, every operation is a node in the graph, the edges point at the previously "seen" operations of all authors. We can “lock in” the group state from this moment on and agree on finality: Every change which will be applied into that “past” will be considered byzantine behaviour and illegal. This “fork the past” we also call equivocation and consensus protocols like that can help us to detect and mitigate them.
p2panda
@p2panda@autonomous.zone  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago
A diagram showing a directed acyclic graph where different authors published their operations in, every operation is a node in the graph, the edges point at the previously "seen" operations of all authors. We can “lock in” the group state from this moment on and agree on finality: Every change which will be applied into that “past” will be considered byzantine behaviour and illegal. This “fork the past” we also call equivocation and consensus protocols like that can help us to detect and mitigate them.
A diagram showing a directed acyclic graph where different authors published their operations in, every operation is a node in the graph, the edges point at the previously "seen" operations of all authors. We can “lock in” the group state from this moment on and agree on finality: Every change which will be applied into that “past” will be considered byzantine behaviour and illegal. This “fork the past” we also call equivocation and consensus protocols like that can help us to detect and mitigate them.
A diagram showing a directed acyclic graph where different authors published their operations in, every operation is a node in the graph, the edges point at the previously "seen" operations of all authors. We can “lock in” the group state from this moment on and agree on finality: Every change which will be applied into that “past” will be considered byzantine behaviour and illegal. This “fork the past” we also call equivocation and consensus protocols like that can help us to detect and mitigate them.
Lutin Discret
@lutindiscret@mastodon.libre-entreprise.com  ·  activity timestamp 4 months ago
Home Login