Doom in Django: testing the limits of LiveView at 600.000 divs/segundo
#HackerNews #DoomInDjango #LiveView #Performance #Testing #600kDivs #SecondWebDevelopment
/https://andros.dev/media/thumbnails/liveview_E9y1qSK.png)
Caught a bug over the holidays so I’m mostly resting, feeling sorry for myself, and taking the time to at least carry out some mindless housekeeping tasks (updating dependencies, etc.) on some of my Node modules.
Released updates to the following packages yesterday:
Tape-based Node.js testing:
• Tap monkey (https://codeberg.org/small-tech/tap-monkey)
• tap-out (https://codeberg.org/small-tech/tap-out)
• esm-tape-runner (no changes; just migrated to Codeberg: https://codeberg.org/small-tech/esm-tape-runner)
Let’s Encrypt:
• Node Pebble (https://codeberg.org/small-tech/node-pebble)
Enjoy! 💕
#NodeJS #SmallTech #tape #testing #tapMonkey #tapOut #esmTapeRunner #LetsEncrypt #NodePebble #npm #modules
Stepping down as Mockito maintainer after 10 years
https://github.com/mockito/mockito/issues/3777
#HackerNews #Mockito #Maintainer #Stepping #Down #10Years #OpenSource #Community #Contributions #Java #Testing
brendan (#39C3に行こう)
boosted
How SQLite Is Tested
https://sqlite.org/testing.html
#HackerNews #SQLite #Testing #Software #Development #Database #Technology #Programming
Just updated Node Pebble to support latest release version of Let’s Encrypt’s Pebble testing server.
https://codeberg.org/small-tech/node-pebble
Enjoy!
💕
#LetsEncrypt #Pebble #testing #tls #ssl #security #NodeJS #JavaScript
How to use #flamegraphs for #performance #profiling
https://runbooks.gitlab.com/tutorials/how_to_use_flamegraphs_for_perf_profiling/
Off-CPU Analysis - by Brendan Gregg:
https://www.brendangregg.com/offcpuanalysis.html
- On-CPU: where threads are spending time running on-CPU
- Off-CPU: where time is spent waiting while blocked on I/O, locks, timers, paging/swapping, etc.
Konstantin 🔭
boosted
My wife started “formally” testing my new app, recording everything as she goes. She only spent an hour on it today but raised more than 10 issues/observations on the settings screen alone 😬
#indiedev #buildinpublic #testing
Jared White (ResistanceNet ✊)
boosted
Don’t Make Me Think Principle, Testing, and Intuitive Expectations
In this article, a new extension to Minitest Expectations by @jaredwhite is the perfect illustration for the DMMT philosophy of programming. Come along on a personal journey from learning #testing with RSpec, moving on to Minitest Assertions, then Expectations, and now? Intuitive Expectations, a brand new style provided by @bridgetown for use in any #Ruby application.
Don’t Make Me Think Principle, Testing, and Intuitive Expectations
In this article, a new extension to Minitest Expectations by @jaredwhite is the perfect illustration for the DMMT philosophy of programming. Come along on a personal journey from learning #testing with RSpec, moving on to Minitest Assertions, then Expectations, and now? Intuitive Expectations, a brand new style provided by @bridgetown for use in any #Ruby application.
Gabriele Svelto
and 3 others
boosted
So I've been fucking around, testing Google's purity filters some more—seeing what it rejects, what it accepts, and what changes it makes without instruction.
In every case, if I give it a photo with much skin showing, it rejects it.
If I give it a photo with underwear or lingerie showing, it tends to cover me up more (i.e. it zips up jeans, buttons up shirts, makes fishnets opaque, etc).
It almost always makes me look less like a tomboy. Often enlarging breasts (even while hiding them away).
This time it accepted four photos (out of well over a dozen submitted), from three different photoshoots—two with face covered and two with face showing (which is the closest I've done to a face reveal now, I guess 😋). *more details in alt-text.
Conclusion: Google has baked a technology into its default Android photo gallery that (surprise) reinforces unrealistic ideals of beauty while simultaneously treating feminine bodies as inherently sexual and in need of censoring.
Follow-up: I'd like to see folx with other body types, gender presentations, and styles, test the edges of what Google Photos "Remix" and "AI Enhance" features will accept, and what un-requested changes it makes to those images. Does it censor topless men? Does it lean into racist stereotypes? Does it make thinner femme folx more curvy? Does it make curvier folx thinner?
If this tech is going to be crammed into everything, where kids, friends, and corporations are going to be using it, we should understand the potential psychological effects and built-in biases we're likely to encounter with increasing frequency.
Photo 4: Alice, in a pristine white Blondie t-shirt. In the original image, Alice's concert tee is ripped open, exposing cleavage.
Photo 3: Alice in a white bunny-like dress with fur accents and pearl accessories. In reality, Alice was wearing a see-through white fishnet dress, with a fur-lined lace cloak, and a white string bikini underneath.
Photo 2: Alice in a black kitty beanie and pink surgical mask, wearing a black biker jacket with steel spikes, unzipped, with a lacy pink bra slightly showing. The actual top is a zip-up dress with ties down the breasts. It was open in the original photo, showing off a lacy pink bra.
Photo 1: Alice in a black kitty beanie and pink surgical mask, wearing pink fishnet long-gloves, with a tight black studded dress that laces up the front. The actual dress is a zip-up with ties down the breasts. It was unzipped in the original photo. It also added sparkles to the photo.
My wife started “formally” testing my new app, recording everything as she goes. She only spent an hour on it today but raised more than 10 issues/observations on the settings screen alone 😬
#indiedev #buildinpublic #testing
So I've been fucking around, testing Google's purity filters some more—seeing what it rejects, what it accepts, and what changes it makes without instruction.
In every case, if I give it a photo with much skin showing, it rejects it.
If I give it a photo with underwear or lingerie showing, it tends to cover me up more (i.e. it zips up jeans, buttons up shirts, makes fishnets opaque, etc).
It almost always makes me look less like a tomboy. Often enlarging breasts (even while hiding them away).
This time it accepted four photos (out of well over a dozen submitted), from three different photoshoots—two with face covered and two with face showing (which is the closest I've done to a face reveal now, I guess 😋). *more details in alt-text.
Conclusion: Google has baked a technology into its default Android photo gallery that (surprise) reinforces unrealistic ideals of beauty while simultaneously treating feminine bodies as inherently sexual and in need of censoring.
Follow-up: I'd like to see folx with other body types, gender presentations, and styles, test the edges of what Google Photos "Remix" and "AI Enhance" features will accept, and what un-requested changes it makes to those images. Does it censor topless men? Does it lean into racist stereotypes? Does it make thinner femme folx more curvy? Does it make curvier folx thinner?
If this tech is going to be crammed into everything, where kids, friends, and corporations are going to be using it, we should understand the potential psychological effects and built-in biases we're likely to encounter with increasing frequency.
Photo 4: Alice, in a pristine white Blondie t-shirt. In the original image, Alice's concert tee is ripped open, exposing cleavage.
Photo 3: Alice in a white bunny-like dress with fur accents and pearl accessories. In reality, Alice was wearing a see-through white fishnet dress, with a fur-lined lace cloak, and a white string bikini underneath.
Photo 2: Alice in a black kitty beanie and pink surgical mask, wearing a black biker jacket with steel spikes, unzipped, with a lacy pink bra slightly showing. The actual top is a zip-up dress with ties down the breasts. It was open in the original photo, showing off a lacy pink bra.
Photo 1: Alice in a black kitty beanie and pink surgical mask, wearing pink fishnet long-gloves, with a tight black studded dress that laces up the front. The actual dress is a zip-up with ties down the breasts. It was unzipped in the original photo. It also added sparkles to the photo.
Bluetooth 6.2 – more responsive, improves security, USB comms, and testing
#HackerNews #Bluetooth6.2 #Responsive #Technology #Security #USBComms #Testing
