

#Tag
Funny, people always forget to fill out all the details on their website leaving the "Lorem ipsum", the LLM engines are replicating that mistake on their machine generated slop pages
I asked the computer for cat food recipes
And it told me to cook my cat
Can't question the computer of course,
But I'm not sure if Fluffy would like that
Fluffy isn't liking this,
I don't think Fluffy wants to lose a life
Making food for kitty shouldn't involve
Chasing Fluffy around with a knife
Aw heck this is too much effort
I'll just open up a can
Making cat food is too much work
Especially when you try to put kitty in a pan
#poem (human poem about AI slop)
ps. Don't cook kitty!
pps. Yes, this is sarcasm.
Funny, people always forget to fill out all the details on their website leaving the "Lorem ipsum", the LLM engines are replicating that mistake on their machine generated slop pages
https://calmatters.org/economy/technology/2025/09/chatgpt-lawyer-fine-ai-regulation/
The attorney must pay a $10,000 fine.
"The court of appeals said 21 of 23 quotes in an opening brief were fake"
“We therefore publish this opinion as a warning,” it continued. “Simply stated, no brief, pleading, motion, or any other paper filed in any court should contain any citations— whether provided by generative AI or any other source—that the attorney responsible for submitting the pleading has not personally read and verified.”
https://calmatters.org/economy/technology/2025/09/chatgpt-lawyer-fine-ai-regulation/
The attorney must pay a $10,000 fine.
"The court of appeals said 21 of 23 quotes in an opening brief were fake"
“We therefore publish this opinion as a warning,” it continued. “Simply stated, no brief, pleading, motion, or any other paper filed in any court should contain any citations— whether provided by generative AI or any other source—that the attorney responsible for submitting the pleading has not personally read and verified.”
'There are lots of podcasts, made by humans, that offer listeners original reporting...AI-generated podcasts can basically only offer a facsimile of that, cribbing the works of others to produce something vaguely passable.'
'There are lots of podcasts, made by humans, that offer listeners original reporting...AI-generated podcasts can basically only offer a facsimile of that, cribbing the works of others to produce something vaguely passable.'
AI, the New Aesthetics of Fascism, by Gareth Watkins
https://newsocialist.org.uk/transmissions/ai-the-new-aesthetics-of-fascism/
(Tip of the hat to Anthony Moser via @davidgerard )
AI, the New Aesthetics of Fascism, by Gareth Watkins
https://newsocialist.org.uk/transmissions/ai-the-new-aesthetics-of-fascism/
(Tip of the hat to Anthony Moser via @davidgerard )
The #OpenStreetMap project has been dealing with #AI #slop for almost a decade. It's sooooo bad. It's so rubbish. The quality is bad. It never meets what the salesmen promise. It takes much more time to fix it up than it would have taken to do it properly.
The #OpenStreetMap project has been dealing with #AI #slop for almost a decade. It's sooooo bad. It's so rubbish. The quality is bad. It never meets what the salesmen promise. It takes much more time to fix it up than it would have taken to do it properly.
When Google’s slop meets webslop, search stops: https://pluralistic.net/2025/07/15/inhuman-gigapede/#coprophagic-ai
A very good article on awful Google AI search results and how Google have ruined their own reputation by wrecking their workforce, by @pluralistic. A quote:
'Publishers and advertisers have more concentrated money than readers, but the dominant theory of antitrust since the Reagan administration is something called "consumer welfare," which holds that monopolistic conduct is only to be condemned if it makes consumers worse off. If a company screws its workers or suppliers in order to deliver better products and/or better prices, then "consumer welfare" holds that the government should celebrate and protect the monopolist for improving "efficiency."
But all that is true only if Google AI Overviews are good. And they are very, very bad.'
Don't use Google for search.
#google#AI#ArtificialIntelligence#AISlop#CoryDoctorow #search #slop
When Google’s slop meets webslop, search stops: https://pluralistic.net/2025/07/15/inhuman-gigapede/#coprophagic-ai
A very good article on awful Google AI search results and how Google have ruined their own reputation by wrecking their workforce, by @pluralistic. A quote:
'Publishers and advertisers have more concentrated money than readers, but the dominant theory of antitrust since the Reagan administration is something called "consumer welfare," which holds that monopolistic conduct is only to be condemned if it makes consumers worse off. If a company screws its workers or suppliers in order to deliver better products and/or better prices, then "consumer welfare" holds that the government should celebrate and protect the monopolist for improving "efficiency."
But all that is true only if Google AI Overviews are good. And they are very, very bad.'
Don't use Google for search.
#google#AI#ArtificialIntelligence#AISlop#CoryDoctorow #search #slop
You know how these days, search engines put garbage LLM summaries above results - and then prioritize links to garbage LLM pages above real sites in the results links?
Can we call those "top of the slops"?
You know how these days, search engines put garbage LLM summaries above results - and then prioritize links to garbage LLM pages above real sites in the results links?
Can we call those "top of the slops"?
...and seeing some "funny" AI slop circulating on Mastodon just now, makes me wish there was a feature to flag AI content, just like it's possible to flag other inapproriate material...
Edit: as it happens, there already is a request for this in Mastodon upstream: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/30277
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate