You cannot make two views in different hierarchies the same size. Containment-based layout is good enough.
The #SwiftUI View Body instrument only shows body executions despite a lot of work happening in other parts of the code. Leaf views like Text and container views like V/HStack also don’t have body getters so they also don’t show up. Having view bodies from your own named views show up + some SwiftUI views is good enough. (Note: the SwiftUI instrument in Instruments 26 was significantly improved. I believe it fixes some of these issues no have not formed an opinion on it, yet)
A SwiftUI Form view in the grouped style is embedded into its own scroll view. In the grouped style it’s not in a scroll view. There is no way to get rid of the scroll view around a grouped form to eg embed it in your own scroll view with additional UI. Having Form only work well if it’s filling the whole content of the current container is good enough.
Being able to completely disable interactive dismiss of sheets is good enough. There is no need to have a delegate callback (like in UIKit) that would allow putting up a confirmation dialog if data would be lost by „swipe to dismiss“. You can either turn it in or off, that’s it.
Applying a background modifier to a Grid does not actually set the background of the grid but only of all the individual grid elements. That’s good enough.
Our design Toolkits for Figma and Sketch still contain the default cell styles from UIKit (single label, title + subtitle label, label + value) but there isn’t actually any way to easily create these in SwiftUI. It’s good enough to have devs work with designers to figure out what the precise measurements, fonts etc. in Figma are to try to replicate what‘s sold to designers as a default component in SwiftUI.
Who needs a target-action-first-responder pattern in menus? Action closures should be good enough for everyone. It you really want to, you can just call NSApplication to invoke that responder chain manually from the closure.
#iOS #UIKit
