Trop gros, trop cher, trop moche..., le système de publications scientifiques est à bout de souffle. Un article de "niche" pour passer un bon été :https://www.lemonde.fr/sciences/article/2025/07/07/le-monde-des-revues-scientifiques-au-bord-de-l-asphyxie_6619660_1650684.html
(allez au bout car il y a des messages d'espoirs...)

et en bonus, un "appui" sur l'usage de l'IA qui n'arrange rien,
https://www.lemonde.fr/sciences/article/2025/07/07/comment-l-ia-bouscule-les-publications-scientifiques_6619655_1650684.html

#science #preprint #recherche #pci #pubpeer #matilda #openaccess #retraction
@BorisBarbour @enroweb @ElisabethBik

Trop gros, trop cher, trop moche..., le système de publications scientifiques est à bout de souffle. Un article de "niche" pour passer un bon été :https://www.lemonde.fr/sciences/article/2025/07/07/le-monde-des-revues-scientifiques-au-bord-de-l-asphyxie_6619660_1650684.html
(allez au bout car il y a des messages d'espoirs...)

et en bonus, un "appui" sur l'usage de l'IA qui n'arrange rien,
https://www.lemonde.fr/sciences/article/2025/07/07/comment-l-ia-bouscule-les-publications-scientifiques_6619655_1650684.html

#science #preprint #recherche #pci #pubpeer #matilda #openaccess #retraction
@BorisBarbour @enroweb @ElisabethBik

From the editorial of the new #PCI#Psychology (https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m456e_v1):

> "The barrier to expanding the list of PCI-Friendly journals is not us. We are happy to work
with any reputable journal that is willing to work with us. Rather, the barrier is the for-profit
publishing industry, academic societies, and researchers’ own investment in the current system. The barrier is the unwillingness to give up control, the unwillingness to move from a system of closely-held power by the few to a more distributed system of power among the many.“

Hear, hear!

I fully support PCI Psych. As explained in my personal reviewing policy (https://www.nicebread.de/posts/reviewing_policy.html), I will devote my reviewing and editing contributions nearly exclusively to diamond #OA and community-driven publication initiatives.

From the editorial of the new #PCI#Psychology (https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m456e_v1):

> "The barrier to expanding the list of PCI-Friendly journals is not us. We are happy to work
with any reputable journal that is willing to work with us. Rather, the barrier is the for-profit
publishing industry, academic societies, and researchers’ own investment in the current system. The barrier is the unwillingness to give up control, the unwillingness to move from a system of closely-held power by the few to a more distributed system of power among the many.“

Hear, hear!

I fully support PCI Psych. As explained in my personal reviewing policy (https://www.nicebread.de/posts/reviewing_policy.html), I will devote my reviewing and editing contributions nearly exclusively to diamond #OA and community-driven publication initiatives.

L'université de Nantes se désabonne de la base Wiley et du #WebOfScience pour utiliser #OpenAlex et soutenir des initiatives de la #ScienceOuverte dont #PCI et #OpenEditionhttps://www.univ-nantes.fr/recherche-et-innovation/science-ouverte-et-publications/des-desabonnements-pour-mieux-soutenir-la-science-ouverte