Information Is Beautiful
@infobeautiful@vis.social  ·  activity timestamp last week
A table listing various article titles and their corresponding bit.ly links, sorted by publication date from August 2024 to May 2023. The table has four columns: Title, bit.ly link, Published date, and Updated (empty). Topics include 'Per Second', 'WaterWorld', several articles about plastics, 'Two Years of the Russia-Ukraine War', among others. Most links are either geni.us or Google Docs spreadsheet URLs. Dates range from most recent (01 Aug 2024) to oldest (24 May 2023)
A table listing various article titles and their corresponding bit.ly links, sorted by publication date from August 2024 to May 2023. The table has four columns: Title, bit.ly link, Published date, and Updated (empty). Topics include 'Per Second', 'WaterWorld', several articles about plastics, 'Two Years of the Russia-Ukraine War', among others. Most links are either geni.us or Google Docs spreadsheet URLs. Dates range from most recent (01 Aug 2024) to oldest (24 May 2023)
A table listing various article titles and their corresponding bit.ly links, sorted by publication date from August 2024 to May 2023. The table has four columns: Title, bit.ly link, Published date, and Updated (empty). Topics include 'Per Second', 'WaterWorld', several articles about plastics, 'Two Years of the Russia-Ukraine War', among others. Most links are either geni.us or Google Docs spreadsheet URLs. Dates range from most recent (01 Aug 2024) to oldest (24 May 2023)
Lisa Hornung
@LisaHornung@fosstodon.org  ·  activity timestamp last week
screenshot recording of the project page showing the header – Lazy Cats – and scrolling down the page. The page includes a range of charts (bar chart, dot plot, sankey, beeswarm) that the user can interact with to get more details in popups or show data for winter or summer seasons
Dot plot titled “Average time cats spend by activity,” comparing one cat named Lily to a group of other cats. The yaxis lists activities: Sitting, Lying, Standing, Grooming, Eating, Active, Scratching, and Littering. The xaxis shows percentage of time spent, from 0% to 60%. Each activity has three markers: light blue circles for individual other cats, a black triangle for the median value, and a blue-outlined circle for Lily. For example, Lily spends more time sitting than most cats, but less time grooming. The chart highlights how Lily’s behavior aligns or diverges from typical feline patterns
Dot plot titled “Average time cats spend by activity,” comparing one cat named Lily to a group of other cats. The yaxis lists activities: Sitting, Lying, Standing, Grooming, Eating, Active, Scratching, and Littering. The xaxis shows percentage of time spent, from 0% to 60%. Each activity has three markers: light blue circles for individual other cats, a black triangle for the median value, and a blue-outlined circle for Lily. For example, Lily spends more time sitting than most cats, but less time grooming. The chart highlights how Lily’s behavior aligns or diverges from typical feline patterns
Dot plot titled “Average time cats spend by activity,” comparing one cat named Lily to a group of other cats. The yaxis lists activities: Sitting, Lying, Standing, Grooming, Eating, Active, Scratching, and Littering. The xaxis shows percentage of time spent, from 0% to 60%. Each activity has three markers: light blue circles for individual other cats, a black triangle for the median value, and a blue-outlined circle for Lily. For example, Lily spends more time sitting than most cats, but less time grooming. The chart highlights how Lily’s behavior aligns or diverges from typical feline patterns
Sankey diagram showing the top three winter activities of cats ranked by time spent. The diagram has three columns labeled “Most popular,” “Second,” and “Third.” Each column lists activities such as sitting, lying, standing, and eating, with colored flows connecting them to show how rankings shift. For example, “Sitting” is the most popular activity for 14 cats; 8 others rank it second, and 5 rank it third. “Lying” is also most popular for 14 cats, the other 14 cats rank it second. “Standing” appears most often as a third-ranked activity. The chart highlights how feline preferences vary in winter, with sitting and lying dominating the top ranks and standing emerging as a frequent third choice
Sankey diagram showing the top three winter activities of cats ranked by time spent. The diagram has three columns labeled “Most popular,” “Second,” and “Third.” Each column lists activities such as sitting, lying, standing, and eating, with colored flows connecting them to show how rankings shift. For example, “Sitting” is the most popular activity for 14 cats; 8 others rank it second, and 5 rank it third. “Lying” is also most popular for 14 cats, the other 14 cats rank it second. “Standing” appears most often as a third-ranked activity. The chart highlights how feline preferences vary in winter, with sitting and lying dominating the top ranks and standing emerging as a frequent third choice
Sankey diagram showing the top three winter activities of cats ranked by time spent. The diagram has three columns labeled “Most popular,” “Second,” and “Third.” Each column lists activities such as sitting, lying, standing, and eating, with colored flows connecting them to show how rankings shift. For example, “Sitting” is the most popular activity for 14 cats; 8 others rank it second, and 5 rank it third. “Lying” is also most popular for 14 cats, the other 14 cats rank it second. “Standing” appears most often as a third-ranked activity. The chart highlights how feline preferences vary in winter, with sitting and lying dominating the top ranks and standing emerging as a frequent third choice
A beeswarm chart illustrating the relationship between cats’ activity levels, seasonal laziness, weight, categorized by indoor versus indoor/outdoor lifestyle. The xaxis shows the percentage of time spent lying or sitting (ranging from ~60% to 85%), while the yaxis represents whether cats are more lazy in winter or summer. Cat icons in sitting or lying positions indicate the specific cat’s most favourite pose. Green icons represent indoor cats; blue icons represent indoor/outdoor cats. The number of stripes in a cat’s tail indicate the weight (Ideal, Overweight, Heavy, or Obese). The chart suggests that indoor cats tend to be slightly less active.
A beeswarm chart illustrating the relationship between cats’ activity levels, seasonal laziness, weight, categorized by indoor versus indoor/outdoor lifestyle. The xaxis shows the percentage of time spent lying or sitting (ranging from ~60% to 85%), while the yaxis represents whether cats are more lazy in winter or summer. Cat icons in sitting or lying positions indicate the specific cat’s most favourite pose. Green icons represent indoor cats; blue icons represent indoor/outdoor cats. The number of stripes in a cat’s tail indicate the weight (Ideal, Overweight, Heavy, or Obese). The chart suggests that indoor cats tend to be slightly less active.
A beeswarm chart illustrating the relationship between cats’ activity levels, seasonal laziness, weight, categorized by indoor versus indoor/outdoor lifestyle. The xaxis shows the percentage of time spent lying or sitting (ranging from ~60% to 85%), while the yaxis represents whether cats are more lazy in winter or summer. Cat icons in sitting or lying positions indicate the specific cat’s most favourite pose. Green icons represent indoor cats; blue icons represent indoor/outdoor cats. The number of stripes in a cat’s tail indicate the weight (Ideal, Overweight, Heavy, or Obese). The chart suggests that indoor cats tend to be slightly less active.
Lisa Hornung
@LisaHornung@fosstodon.org  ·  activity timestamp last week
screenshot recording of the project page showing the header – Lazy Cats – and scrolling down the page. The page includes a range of charts (bar chart, dot plot, sankey, beeswarm) that the user can interact with to get more details in popups or show data for winter or summer seasons
Dot plot titled “Average time cats spend by activity,” comparing one cat named Lily to a group of other cats. The yaxis lists activities: Sitting, Lying, Standing, Grooming, Eating, Active, Scratching, and Littering. The xaxis shows percentage of time spent, from 0% to 60%. Each activity has three markers: light blue circles for individual other cats, a black triangle for the median value, and a blue-outlined circle for Lily. For example, Lily spends more time sitting than most cats, but less time grooming. The chart highlights how Lily’s behavior aligns or diverges from typical feline patterns
Dot plot titled “Average time cats spend by activity,” comparing one cat named Lily to a group of other cats. The yaxis lists activities: Sitting, Lying, Standing, Grooming, Eating, Active, Scratching, and Littering. The xaxis shows percentage of time spent, from 0% to 60%. Each activity has three markers: light blue circles for individual other cats, a black triangle for the median value, and a blue-outlined circle for Lily. For example, Lily spends more time sitting than most cats, but less time grooming. The chart highlights how Lily’s behavior aligns or diverges from typical feline patterns
Dot plot titled “Average time cats spend by activity,” comparing one cat named Lily to a group of other cats. The yaxis lists activities: Sitting, Lying, Standing, Grooming, Eating, Active, Scratching, and Littering. The xaxis shows percentage of time spent, from 0% to 60%. Each activity has three markers: light blue circles for individual other cats, a black triangle for the median value, and a blue-outlined circle for Lily. For example, Lily spends more time sitting than most cats, but less time grooming. The chart highlights how Lily’s behavior aligns or diverges from typical feline patterns
Sankey diagram showing the top three winter activities of cats ranked by time spent. The diagram has three columns labeled “Most popular,” “Second,” and “Third.” Each column lists activities such as sitting, lying, standing, and eating, with colored flows connecting them to show how rankings shift. For example, “Sitting” is the most popular activity for 14 cats; 8 others rank it second, and 5 rank it third. “Lying” is also most popular for 14 cats, the other 14 cats rank it second. “Standing” appears most often as a third-ranked activity. The chart highlights how feline preferences vary in winter, with sitting and lying dominating the top ranks and standing emerging as a frequent third choice
Sankey diagram showing the top three winter activities of cats ranked by time spent. The diagram has three columns labeled “Most popular,” “Second,” and “Third.” Each column lists activities such as sitting, lying, standing, and eating, with colored flows connecting them to show how rankings shift. For example, “Sitting” is the most popular activity for 14 cats; 8 others rank it second, and 5 rank it third. “Lying” is also most popular for 14 cats, the other 14 cats rank it second. “Standing” appears most often as a third-ranked activity. The chart highlights how feline preferences vary in winter, with sitting and lying dominating the top ranks and standing emerging as a frequent third choice
Sankey diagram showing the top three winter activities of cats ranked by time spent. The diagram has three columns labeled “Most popular,” “Second,” and “Third.” Each column lists activities such as sitting, lying, standing, and eating, with colored flows connecting them to show how rankings shift. For example, “Sitting” is the most popular activity for 14 cats; 8 others rank it second, and 5 rank it third. “Lying” is also most popular for 14 cats, the other 14 cats rank it second. “Standing” appears most often as a third-ranked activity. The chart highlights how feline preferences vary in winter, with sitting and lying dominating the top ranks and standing emerging as a frequent third choice
A beeswarm chart illustrating the relationship between cats’ activity levels, seasonal laziness, weight, categorized by indoor versus indoor/outdoor lifestyle. The xaxis shows the percentage of time spent lying or sitting (ranging from ~60% to 85%), while the yaxis represents whether cats are more lazy in winter or summer. Cat icons in sitting or lying positions indicate the specific cat’s most favourite pose. Green icons represent indoor cats; blue icons represent indoor/outdoor cats. The number of stripes in a cat’s tail indicate the weight (Ideal, Overweight, Heavy, or Obese). The chart suggests that indoor cats tend to be slightly less active.
A beeswarm chart illustrating the relationship between cats’ activity levels, seasonal laziness, weight, categorized by indoor versus indoor/outdoor lifestyle. The xaxis shows the percentage of time spent lying or sitting (ranging from ~60% to 85%), while the yaxis represents whether cats are more lazy in winter or summer. Cat icons in sitting or lying positions indicate the specific cat’s most favourite pose. Green icons represent indoor cats; blue icons represent indoor/outdoor cats. The number of stripes in a cat’s tail indicate the weight (Ideal, Overweight, Heavy, or Obese). The chart suggests that indoor cats tend to be slightly less active.
A beeswarm chart illustrating the relationship between cats’ activity levels, seasonal laziness, weight, categorized by indoor versus indoor/outdoor lifestyle. The xaxis shows the percentage of time spent lying or sitting (ranging from ~60% to 85%), while the yaxis represents whether cats are more lazy in winter or summer. Cat icons in sitting or lying positions indicate the specific cat’s most favourite pose. Green icons represent indoor cats; blue icons represent indoor/outdoor cats. The number of stripes in a cat’s tail indicate the weight (Ideal, Overweight, Heavy, or Obese). The chart suggests that indoor cats tend to be slightly less active.
sport of sacred spherical cows
@beadsland@hcommons.social  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago
Chart: Est. & Reported U.S. Variant Proportions by Common Name Sources: CDC, Cov-Lineages, NYITCOM, others [ beadsland on Ko-fi ] Reskin of CDC's Variants Nowcast, and any significant variants in GISAID not broken out by CDC. Four bar-style tree-charts, for four-week periods through 8/31–9/27. Legend of last four-week period, organized by subheadings of color-grouped families and convergent clusters. Percentages overlay each color key, reflecting share as of most recent tree-chart. Mostly WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 dynasty. Stratus XFG family accounts for largely share. For 8/31–9/27, packed bubble charts fill single-variant tiles, reflecting GISAID detail not shown by CDC's Nowcast. Legend: LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [red]: 85% - XFG.2†, XFG.3†, XFG.4.1†, XFG.3.4.1 / QF†, XFG.5.1†, XFG.14.1†, XFG.5.2†, XFG.8†, XFG.3.15† & other Stratus XFG JN.1.11 [browns]: 0% - KP.3 0% - KP.1.1.3 / LP, PA.1 & MC.10.1 6% - NW.1 & other FDA-Vaccine-Target LP.8.1 JN.1 + FLiRT-LF-7 [blues]: ⅖% - LF.7.9, LF.7.7.1 / PV & LF.7.2.1 / PC ⅗% - other LF.7 LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [purple]: ⅗% - XFC JN.1 [greens]: ¼% - JN.1.16.1 / LF 0% - XEC & XEC.4 Other [greys]: 7% - Nimbus NB.1.8.1 / PQ, XDV.1 & other Omicron-2 BA.2 ⅒% - Omicron B.1.1.529 / BA & Other (not specified) _____ Omicron-2 BA.2 is a child of 2022 Omicron B.1.1.529. Stratus XFG is a child of April's WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LF.7 and Juneish JN.1.11 scion LP.8.1.2 / NW. [Some footnotes omitted, due to too many recombinants.]
Chart: Est. & Reported U.S. Variant Proportions by Common Name Sources: CDC, Cov-Lineages, NYITCOM, others [ beadsland on Ko-fi ] Reskin of CDC's Variants Nowcast, and any significant variants in GISAID not broken out by CDC. Four bar-style tree-charts, for four-week periods through 8/31–9/27. Legend of last four-week period, organized by subheadings of color-grouped families and convergent clusters. Percentages overlay each color key, reflecting share as of most recent tree-chart. Mostly WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 dynasty. Stratus XFG family accounts for largely share. For 8/31–9/27, packed bubble charts fill single-variant tiles, reflecting GISAID detail not shown by CDC's Nowcast. Legend: LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [red]: 85% - XFG.2†, XFG.3†, XFG.4.1†, XFG.3.4.1 / QF†, XFG.5.1†, XFG.14.1†, XFG.5.2†, XFG.8†, XFG.3.15† & other Stratus XFG JN.1.11 [browns]: 0% - KP.3 0% - KP.1.1.3 / LP, PA.1 & MC.10.1 6% - NW.1 & other FDA-Vaccine-Target LP.8.1 JN.1 + FLiRT-LF-7 [blues]: ⅖% - LF.7.9, LF.7.7.1 / PV & LF.7.2.1 / PC ⅗% - other LF.7 LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [purple]: ⅗% - XFC JN.1 [greens]: ¼% - JN.1.16.1 / LF 0% - XEC & XEC.4 Other [greys]: 7% - Nimbus NB.1.8.1 / PQ, XDV.1 & other Omicron-2 BA.2 ⅒% - Omicron B.1.1.529 / BA & Other (not specified) _____ Omicron-2 BA.2 is a child of 2022 Omicron B.1.1.529. Stratus XFG is a child of April's WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LF.7 and Juneish JN.1.11 scion LP.8.1.2 / NW. [Some footnotes omitted, due to too many recombinants.]
Chart: Est. & Reported U.S. Variant Proportions by Common Name Sources: CDC, Cov-Lineages, NYITCOM, others [ beadsland on Ko-fi ] Reskin of CDC's Variants Nowcast, and any significant variants in GISAID not broken out by CDC. Four bar-style tree-charts, for four-week periods through 8/31–9/27. Legend of last four-week period, organized by subheadings of color-grouped families and convergent clusters. Percentages overlay each color key, reflecting share as of most recent tree-chart. Mostly WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 dynasty. Stratus XFG family accounts for largely share. For 8/31–9/27, packed bubble charts fill single-variant tiles, reflecting GISAID detail not shown by CDC's Nowcast. Legend: LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [red]: 85% - XFG.2†, XFG.3†, XFG.4.1†, XFG.3.4.1 / QF†, XFG.5.1†, XFG.14.1†, XFG.5.2†, XFG.8†, XFG.3.15† & other Stratus XFG JN.1.11 [browns]: 0% - KP.3 0% - KP.1.1.3 / LP, PA.1 & MC.10.1 6% - NW.1 & other FDA-Vaccine-Target LP.8.1 JN.1 + FLiRT-LF-7 [blues]: ⅖% - LF.7.9, LF.7.7.1 / PV & LF.7.2.1 / PC ⅗% - other LF.7 LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [purple]: ⅗% - XFC JN.1 [greens]: ¼% - JN.1.16.1 / LF 0% - XEC & XEC.4 Other [greys]: 7% - Nimbus NB.1.8.1 / PQ, XDV.1 & other Omicron-2 BA.2 ⅒% - Omicron B.1.1.529 / BA & Other (not specified) _____ Omicron-2 BA.2 is a child of 2022 Omicron B.1.1.529. Stratus XFG is a child of April's WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LF.7 and Juneish JN.1.11 scion LP.8.1.2 / NW. [Some footnotes omitted, due to too many recombinants.]
sport of sacred spherical cows
@beadsland@hcommons.social  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago
Chart: Est. & Reported U.S. Variant Proportions by Common Name Sources: CDC, Cov-Lineages, NYITCOM, others [ beadsland on Ko-fi ] Reskin of CDC's Variants Nowcast, and any significant variants in GISAID not broken out by CDC. Four bar-style tree-charts, for four-week periods through 8/31–9/27. Legend of last four-week period, organized by subheadings of color-grouped families and convergent clusters. Percentages overlay each color key, reflecting share as of most recent tree-chart. Mostly WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 dynasty. Stratus XFG family accounts for largely share. For 8/31–9/27, packed bubble charts fill single-variant tiles, reflecting GISAID detail not shown by CDC's Nowcast. Legend: LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [red]: 85% - XFG.2†, XFG.3†, XFG.4.1†, XFG.3.4.1 / QF†, XFG.5.1†, XFG.14.1†, XFG.5.2†, XFG.8†, XFG.3.15† & other Stratus XFG JN.1.11 [browns]: 0% - KP.3 0% - KP.1.1.3 / LP, PA.1 & MC.10.1 6% - NW.1 & other FDA-Vaccine-Target LP.8.1 JN.1 + FLiRT-LF-7 [blues]: ⅖% - LF.7.9, LF.7.7.1 / PV & LF.7.2.1 / PC ⅗% - other LF.7 LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [purple]: ⅗% - XFC JN.1 [greens]: ¼% - JN.1.16.1 / LF 0% - XEC & XEC.4 Other [greys]: 7% - Nimbus NB.1.8.1 / PQ, XDV.1 & other Omicron-2 BA.2 ⅒% - Omicron B.1.1.529 / BA & Other (not specified) _____ Omicron-2 BA.2 is a child of 2022 Omicron B.1.1.529. Stratus XFG is a child of April's WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LF.7 and Juneish JN.1.11 scion LP.8.1.2 / NW. [Some footnotes omitted, due to too many recombinants.]
Chart: Est. & Reported U.S. Variant Proportions by Common Name Sources: CDC, Cov-Lineages, NYITCOM, others [ beadsland on Ko-fi ] Reskin of CDC's Variants Nowcast, and any significant variants in GISAID not broken out by CDC. Four bar-style tree-charts, for four-week periods through 8/31–9/27. Legend of last four-week period, organized by subheadings of color-grouped families and convergent clusters. Percentages overlay each color key, reflecting share as of most recent tree-chart. Mostly WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 dynasty. Stratus XFG family accounts for largely share. For 8/31–9/27, packed bubble charts fill single-variant tiles, reflecting GISAID detail not shown by CDC's Nowcast. Legend: LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [red]: 85% - XFG.2†, XFG.3†, XFG.4.1†, XFG.3.4.1 / QF†, XFG.5.1†, XFG.14.1†, XFG.5.2†, XFG.8†, XFG.3.15† & other Stratus XFG JN.1.11 [browns]: 0% - KP.3 0% - KP.1.1.3 / LP, PA.1 & MC.10.1 6% - NW.1 & other FDA-Vaccine-Target LP.8.1 JN.1 + FLiRT-LF-7 [blues]: ⅖% - LF.7.9, LF.7.7.1 / PV & LF.7.2.1 / PC ⅗% - other LF.7 LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [purple]: ⅗% - XFC JN.1 [greens]: ¼% - JN.1.16.1 / LF 0% - XEC & XEC.4 Other [greys]: 7% - Nimbus NB.1.8.1 / PQ, XDV.1 & other Omicron-2 BA.2 ⅒% - Omicron B.1.1.529 / BA & Other (not specified) _____ Omicron-2 BA.2 is a child of 2022 Omicron B.1.1.529. Stratus XFG is a child of April's WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LF.7 and Juneish JN.1.11 scion LP.8.1.2 / NW. [Some footnotes omitted, due to too many recombinants.]
Chart: Est. & Reported U.S. Variant Proportions by Common Name Sources: CDC, Cov-Lineages, NYITCOM, others [ beadsland on Ko-fi ] Reskin of CDC's Variants Nowcast, and any significant variants in GISAID not broken out by CDC. Four bar-style tree-charts, for four-week periods through 8/31–9/27. Legend of last four-week period, organized by subheadings of color-grouped families and convergent clusters. Percentages overlay each color key, reflecting share as of most recent tree-chart. Mostly WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 dynasty. Stratus XFG family accounts for largely share. For 8/31–9/27, packed bubble charts fill single-variant tiles, reflecting GISAID detail not shown by CDC's Nowcast. Legend: LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [red]: 85% - XFG.2†, XFG.3†, XFG.4.1†, XFG.3.4.1 / QF†, XFG.5.1†, XFG.14.1†, XFG.5.2†, XFG.8†, XFG.3.15† & other Stratus XFG JN.1.11 [browns]: 0% - KP.3 0% - KP.1.1.3 / LP, PA.1 & MC.10.1 6% - NW.1 & other FDA-Vaccine-Target LP.8.1 JN.1 + FLiRT-LF-7 [blues]: ⅖% - LF.7.9, LF.7.7.1 / PV & LF.7.2.1 / PC ⅗% - other LF.7 LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [purple]: ⅗% - XFC JN.1 [greens]: ¼% - JN.1.16.1 / LF 0% - XEC & XEC.4 Other [greys]: 7% - Nimbus NB.1.8.1 / PQ, XDV.1 & other Omicron-2 BA.2 ⅒% - Omicron B.1.1.529 / BA & Other (not specified) _____ Omicron-2 BA.2 is a child of 2022 Omicron B.1.1.529. Stratus XFG is a child of April's WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LF.7 and Juneish JN.1.11 scion LP.8.1.2 / NW. [Some footnotes omitted, due to too many recombinants.]
sport of sacred spherical cows
@beadsland@hcommons.social  ·  activity timestamp last month
Chart: Estimated and Reported U.S. Variant Proportions by Common Name Sources: CDC, Cov-Lineages, NYITCOM, D. Focosi, WHN, others [ beadsland on Ko-fi ] Reskin of CDC's Variants Nowcast, and any significant variants in GISAID not broken out by CDC. Four bar-style tree-charts, for four-week periods through Aug 31–Sep 27. Legend of last four-week period, organized by subheadings of color-grouped families and convergent clusters. Percentages overlay each color key, reflecting share as of most recent tree-chart. Mostly WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 dynasty. Stratus XFG family accounts for largely share. For 8/3–8/30, packed bubble charts fill single-variant tiles, indicating diversification (per GISAID) not apparent from CDC's Nowcast. Legend: LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [red]: 85% - XFG.3†, XFG.2† & other Stratus XFG JN.1.11 [browns]: 0% - KP.3 0% - KP.1.1.3 / LP, PA.1 & MC.10.1 6% - NW.1 & other FDA-Vaccine-Target LP.8.1 JN.1 + FLiRT-LF-7 [blues]: ⅖% - LF.7.9, LF.7.7.1 / PV & LF.7.2.1 / PC ⅗% - other LF.7 LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [purples]: ⅗% - XFC 0% - other LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD JN.1 [greens]: ¼% - JN.1.16.1 / LF 0% - XEC & XEC.4 Other [greys]: 7% - Nimbus NB.1.8.1 / PQ, PQ.2†, XDV.1 & other Omicron-2 BA.2 ⅒% - Omicron B.1.1.529 / BA & Other (not specified) _____ Omicron-2 BA.2 is a child of 2022 Omicron B.1.1.529. Stratus XFG is a child of April's WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LF.7 and Juneish JN.1.11 scion LP.8.1.2 / NW. [Some footnotes omitted, due to too many recombinants.]
Chart: Estimated and Reported U.S. Variant Proportions by Common Name Sources: CDC, Cov-Lineages, NYITCOM, D. Focosi, WHN, others [ beadsland on Ko-fi ] Reskin of CDC's Variants Nowcast, and any significant variants in GISAID not broken out by CDC. Four bar-style tree-charts, for four-week periods through Aug 31–Sep 27. Legend of last four-week period, organized by subheadings of color-grouped families and convergent clusters. Percentages overlay each color key, reflecting share as of most recent tree-chart. Mostly WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 dynasty. Stratus XFG family accounts for largely share. For 8/3–8/30, packed bubble charts fill single-variant tiles, indicating diversification (per GISAID) not apparent from CDC's Nowcast. Legend: LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [red]: 85% - XFG.3†, XFG.2† & other Stratus XFG JN.1.11 [browns]: 0% - KP.3 0% - KP.1.1.3 / LP, PA.1 & MC.10.1 6% - NW.1 & other FDA-Vaccine-Target LP.8.1 JN.1 + FLiRT-LF-7 [blues]: ⅖% - LF.7.9, LF.7.7.1 / PV & LF.7.2.1 / PC ⅗% - other LF.7 LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [purples]: ⅗% - XFC 0% - other LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD JN.1 [greens]: ¼% - JN.1.16.1 / LF 0% - XEC & XEC.4 Other [greys]: 7% - Nimbus NB.1.8.1 / PQ, PQ.2†, XDV.1 & other Omicron-2 BA.2 ⅒% - Omicron B.1.1.529 / BA & Other (not specified) _____ Omicron-2 BA.2 is a child of 2022 Omicron B.1.1.529. Stratus XFG is a child of April's WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LF.7 and Juneish JN.1.11 scion LP.8.1.2 / NW. [Some footnotes omitted, due to too many recombinants.]
Chart: Estimated and Reported U.S. Variant Proportions by Common Name Sources: CDC, Cov-Lineages, NYITCOM, D. Focosi, WHN, others [ beadsland on Ko-fi ] Reskin of CDC's Variants Nowcast, and any significant variants in GISAID not broken out by CDC. Four bar-style tree-charts, for four-week periods through Aug 31–Sep 27. Legend of last four-week period, organized by subheadings of color-grouped families and convergent clusters. Percentages overlay each color key, reflecting share as of most recent tree-chart. Mostly WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 dynasty. Stratus XFG family accounts for largely share. For 8/3–8/30, packed bubble charts fill single-variant tiles, indicating diversification (per GISAID) not apparent from CDC's Nowcast. Legend: LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [red]: 85% - XFG.3†, XFG.2† & other Stratus XFG JN.1.11 [browns]: 0% - KP.3 0% - KP.1.1.3 / LP, PA.1 & MC.10.1 6% - NW.1 & other FDA-Vaccine-Target LP.8.1 JN.1 + FLiRT-LF-7 [blues]: ⅖% - LF.7.9, LF.7.7.1 / PV & LF.7.2.1 / PC ⅗% - other LF.7 LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [purples]: ⅗% - XFC 0% - other LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD JN.1 [greens]: ¼% - JN.1.16.1 / LF 0% - XEC & XEC.4 Other [greys]: 7% - Nimbus NB.1.8.1 / PQ, PQ.2†, XDV.1 & other Omicron-2 BA.2 ⅒% - Omicron B.1.1.529 / BA & Other (not specified) _____ Omicron-2 BA.2 is a child of 2022 Omicron B.1.1.529. Stratus XFG is a child of April's WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LF.7 and Juneish JN.1.11 scion LP.8.1.2 / NW. [Some footnotes omitted, due to too many recombinants.]
sport of sacred spherical cows
@beadsland@hcommons.social  ·  activity timestamp last month
Chart: Annoplot Dataviz Library*: Project Profile Subtitle: 12.3K lines† across component modules and significant submodules. Multi-level pie chart organized into six major categories by color. Each outer wedge shows a tally of number of lines for that sub-component. Green variants devpie/slice wedge notably exploded out, main devpie & variants wedges slightly; grey dot wedge also exploded somewhat. A legend is split across both sides of the chart. Each key mirrors one of the wedges on the dual pie chart, along with a sentence or two description of each (sub)component thereby represented. Caption: * Pre-release development version 2025-09-30. † Python, Markdown, C, Elixir, and shell source files. Blank lines omitted form tallies. Exploded wedges reflect proportions of lines changed in prior 31 days. Dotted areas represent non-blank comment lines and Markdown. Wedges: 🔴 levels 🧀 [blank wedge] - 460, 🧀 hospitals - 282 🟣 chirp 🧀 [blank] - 537 🔵 annoplot 🧀 [blank] - 544, 🧀 artists - 419, 🧀 artists/adorn - 360, 🧀 artists/deco - 511, 🧀 artists/legend - 419, 🧀 artists/text - 331, 🧀 coord - 583, 🧀 coord/base - 259, 🧀 margin - 256, 🧀 util - 537 🟢 tiop 🧀 [blank] - 235, 🧀 bullseye - 321, 🧀 capacity - 455, 🧀 devpie - 570, 🧀 devpie/slice - 295, 🧀 variants - 754, 🧀 variants/legend - 389, 🧀 variants/orchard - 432, 🧀 variants/rajdash - 600, 🧀 variants/tree - 437, 🧀 …/tree/branch - 359 🟤 bots 🧀 [blank] - 181, 🧀 talky - 821 ⚫ . [period by itself] 🧀 [blank] - 458, 🧀 TODO.md - 497
Chart: Annoplot Dataviz Library*: Project Profile Subtitle: 12.3K lines† across component modules and significant submodules. Multi-level pie chart organized into six major categories by color. Each outer wedge shows a tally of number of lines for that sub-component. Green variants devpie/slice wedge notably exploded out, main devpie & variants wedges slightly; grey dot wedge also exploded somewhat. A legend is split across both sides of the chart. Each key mirrors one of the wedges on the dual pie chart, along with a sentence or two description of each (sub)component thereby represented. Caption: * Pre-release development version 2025-09-30. † Python, Markdown, C, Elixir, and shell source files. Blank lines omitted form tallies. Exploded wedges reflect proportions of lines changed in prior 31 days. Dotted areas represent non-blank comment lines and Markdown. Wedges: 🔴 levels 🧀 [blank wedge] - 460, 🧀 hospitals - 282 🟣 chirp 🧀 [blank] - 537 🔵 annoplot 🧀 [blank] - 544, 🧀 artists - 419, 🧀 artists/adorn - 360, 🧀 artists/deco - 511, 🧀 artists/legend - 419, 🧀 artists/text - 331, 🧀 coord - 583, 🧀 coord/base - 259, 🧀 margin - 256, 🧀 util - 537 🟢 tiop 🧀 [blank] - 235, 🧀 bullseye - 321, 🧀 capacity - 455, 🧀 devpie - 570, 🧀 devpie/slice - 295, 🧀 variants - 754, 🧀 variants/legend - 389, 🧀 variants/orchard - 432, 🧀 variants/rajdash - 600, 🧀 variants/tree - 437, 🧀 …/tree/branch - 359 🟤 bots 🧀 [blank] - 181, 🧀 talky - 821 ⚫ . [period by itself] 🧀 [blank] - 458, 🧀 TODO.md - 497
Chart: Annoplot Dataviz Library*: Project Profile Subtitle: 12.3K lines† across component modules and significant submodules. Multi-level pie chart organized into six major categories by color. Each outer wedge shows a tally of number of lines for that sub-component. Green variants devpie/slice wedge notably exploded out, main devpie & variants wedges slightly; grey dot wedge also exploded somewhat. A legend is split across both sides of the chart. Each key mirrors one of the wedges on the dual pie chart, along with a sentence or two description of each (sub)component thereby represented. Caption: * Pre-release development version 2025-09-30. † Python, Markdown, C, Elixir, and shell source files. Blank lines omitted form tallies. Exploded wedges reflect proportions of lines changed in prior 31 days. Dotted areas represent non-blank comment lines and Markdown. Wedges: 🔴 levels 🧀 [blank wedge] - 460, 🧀 hospitals - 282 🟣 chirp 🧀 [blank] - 537 🔵 annoplot 🧀 [blank] - 544, 🧀 artists - 419, 🧀 artists/adorn - 360, 🧀 artists/deco - 511, 🧀 artists/legend - 419, 🧀 artists/text - 331, 🧀 coord - 583, 🧀 coord/base - 259, 🧀 margin - 256, 🧀 util - 537 🟢 tiop 🧀 [blank] - 235, 🧀 bullseye - 321, 🧀 capacity - 455, 🧀 devpie - 570, 🧀 devpie/slice - 295, 🧀 variants - 754, 🧀 variants/legend - 389, 🧀 variants/orchard - 432, 🧀 variants/rajdash - 600, 🧀 variants/tree - 437, 🧀 …/tree/branch - 359 🟤 bots 🧀 [blank] - 181, 🧀 talky - 821 ⚫ . [period by itself] 🧀 [blank] - 458, 🧀 TODO.md - 497
Yogthos
@yogthos@social.marxist.network  ·  activity timestamp last month
sport of sacred spherical cows
@beadsland@hcommons.social  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago
Chart: Est. & Reported U.S. Variant Proportions by Common Name Sources: CDC, Cov-Lineages, NYITCOM, others [ beadsland on Ko-fi ] Reskin of CDC's Variants Nowcast, and any significant variants in GISAID not broken out by CDC. Four bar-style tree-charts, for four-week periods through 8/3–8/30. Legend of last four-week period, organized by subheadings of color-grouped families and convergent clusters. Percentages overlay each color key, reflecting share as of most recent tree-chart. Stratus XFG family accounts for over three quarters share. For 8/3–8/30, packed bubble charts fill single-variant tiles, reflecting GISAID detail not shown by CDC's Nowcast. Legend: LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [red]: 78% - XFG.3†, XFG.2† & other Stratus XFG Omicron-2 BA.2 [brown]: 14% - XDV.1, PQ.2† & other Nimbus NB.1.8.1 / PQ JN.1 [greens]: 5% - FDA-Vaccine-Target LP.8.1, NW.1, PA.1 & MC.28.1 ⅕% - XEC 0% - KP.3, XEK & other WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 JN.1 + FLiRT-LF-7 [blues]: ⅖% - LF.7.9 & LF.7.2.1 / PC 1% - other LF.7 LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [purples]: ½% - XFC 0% - other LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD Other [greys]: 0% - other Omicron-2 BA.2 ⅒% - Other (not specified) _____ Omicron-2 BA.2 is a child of 2022 Omicron B.1.1.529. Stratus XFG is a child of April's WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LF.7 and Juneish WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LP.8.1.2 / NW. WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 is a grandchild of Winter 2023–24's Pirola BA.2.86. [Some footnotes omitted, due to too many recombinants.]
Chart: Est. & Reported U.S. Variant Proportions by Common Name Sources: CDC, Cov-Lineages, NYITCOM, others [ beadsland on Ko-fi ] Reskin of CDC's Variants Nowcast, and any significant variants in GISAID not broken out by CDC. Four bar-style tree-charts, for four-week periods through 8/3–8/30. Legend of last four-week period, organized by subheadings of color-grouped families and convergent clusters. Percentages overlay each color key, reflecting share as of most recent tree-chart. Stratus XFG family accounts for over three quarters share. For 8/3–8/30, packed bubble charts fill single-variant tiles, reflecting GISAID detail not shown by CDC's Nowcast. Legend: LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [red]: 78% - XFG.3†, XFG.2† & other Stratus XFG Omicron-2 BA.2 [brown]: 14% - XDV.1, PQ.2† & other Nimbus NB.1.8.1 / PQ JN.1 [greens]: 5% - FDA-Vaccine-Target LP.8.1, NW.1, PA.1 & MC.28.1 ⅕% - XEC 0% - KP.3, XEK & other WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 JN.1 + FLiRT-LF-7 [blues]: ⅖% - LF.7.9 & LF.7.2.1 / PC 1% - other LF.7 LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [purples]: ½% - XFC 0% - other LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD Other [greys]: 0% - other Omicron-2 BA.2 ⅒% - Other (not specified) _____ Omicron-2 BA.2 is a child of 2022 Omicron B.1.1.529. Stratus XFG is a child of April's WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LF.7 and Juneish WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LP.8.1.2 / NW. WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 is a grandchild of Winter 2023–24's Pirola BA.2.86. [Some footnotes omitted, due to too many recombinants.]
Chart: Est. & Reported U.S. Variant Proportions by Common Name Sources: CDC, Cov-Lineages, NYITCOM, others [ beadsland on Ko-fi ] Reskin of CDC's Variants Nowcast, and any significant variants in GISAID not broken out by CDC. Four bar-style tree-charts, for four-week periods through 8/3–8/30. Legend of last four-week period, organized by subheadings of color-grouped families and convergent clusters. Percentages overlay each color key, reflecting share as of most recent tree-chart. Stratus XFG family accounts for over three quarters share. For 8/3–8/30, packed bubble charts fill single-variant tiles, reflecting GISAID detail not shown by CDC's Nowcast. Legend: LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [red]: 78% - XFG.3†, XFG.2† & other Stratus XFG Omicron-2 BA.2 [brown]: 14% - XDV.1, PQ.2† & other Nimbus NB.1.8.1 / PQ JN.1 [greens]: 5% - FDA-Vaccine-Target LP.8.1, NW.1, PA.1 & MC.28.1 ⅕% - XEC 0% - KP.3, XEK & other WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 JN.1 + FLiRT-LF-7 [blues]: ⅖% - LF.7.9 & LF.7.2.1 / PC 1% - other LF.7 LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD [purples]: ½% - XFC 0% - other LF.7 + NTD-meets-RBD Other [greys]: 0% - other Omicron-2 BA.2 ⅒% - Other (not specified) _____ Omicron-2 BA.2 is a child of 2022 Omicron B.1.1.529. Stratus XFG is a child of April's WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LF.7 and Juneish WHO-Vaccine-Target scion LP.8.1.2 / NW. WHO-Vaccine-Target JN.1 is a grandchild of Winter 2023–24's Pirola BA.2.86. [Some footnotes omitted, due to too many recombinants.]
Home Login