Tobias Bernard
@tbernard@mastodon.social  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago
Tobias Bernard
@tbernard@mastodon.social  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago
Vladimir
@3timeslazy@techhub.social  ·  activity timestamp last month
A video of barely working real-time collaboration using LSP and Ethersync in Helix and Neovim
Vladimir
@3timeslazy@techhub.social  ·  activity timestamp last month
A video of barely working real-time collaboration using LSP and Ethersync in Helix and Neovim
Tommi 🤯 → 39C3 and 2 others boosted
adz
@adz@post.lurk.org  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago
Neighbourhoodie Software
@neighbourhoodie@toot.berlin  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago
wakest ⁂ and 1 other boosted
p2panda
@p2panda@autonomous.zone  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago
A diagram showing a directed acyclic graph where different authors published their operations in, every operation is a node in the graph, the edges point at the previously "seen" operations of all authors. We can “lock in” the group state from this moment on and agree on finality: Every change which will be applied into that “past” will be considered byzantine behaviour and illegal. This “fork the past” we also call equivocation and consensus protocols like that can help us to detect and mitigate them.
A diagram showing a directed acyclic graph where different authors published their operations in, every operation is a node in the graph, the edges point at the previously "seen" operations of all authors. We can “lock in” the group state from this moment on and agree on finality: Every change which will be applied into that “past” will be considered byzantine behaviour and illegal. This “fork the past” we also call equivocation and consensus protocols like that can help us to detect and mitigate them.
A diagram showing a directed acyclic graph where different authors published their operations in, every operation is a node in the graph, the edges point at the previously "seen" operations of all authors. We can “lock in” the group state from this moment on and agree on finality: Every change which will be applied into that “past” will be considered byzantine behaviour and illegal. This “fork the past” we also call equivocation and consensus protocols like that can help us to detect and mitigate them.
p2panda
@p2panda@autonomous.zone  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago
A diagram showing a directed acyclic graph where different authors published their operations in, every operation is a node in the graph, the edges point at the previously "seen" operations of all authors. We can “lock in” the group state from this moment on and agree on finality: Every change which will be applied into that “past” will be considered byzantine behaviour and illegal. This “fork the past” we also call equivocation and consensus protocols like that can help us to detect and mitigate them.
A diagram showing a directed acyclic graph where different authors published their operations in, every operation is a node in the graph, the edges point at the previously "seen" operations of all authors. We can “lock in” the group state from this moment on and agree on finality: Every change which will be applied into that “past” will be considered byzantine behaviour and illegal. This “fork the past” we also call equivocation and consensus protocols like that can help us to detect and mitigate them.
A diagram showing a directed acyclic graph where different authors published their operations in, every operation is a node in the graph, the edges point at the previously "seen" operations of all authors. We can “lock in” the group state from this moment on and agree on finality: Every change which will be applied into that “past” will be considered byzantine behaviour and illegal. This “fork the past” we also call equivocation and consensus protocols like that can help us to detect and mitigate them.
Neighbourhoodie Software
@neighbourhoodie@toot.berlin  ·  activity timestamp 3 months ago
Home Login